Rural Livelihood Strategies and Household Food Security of Farmers Surrounding Derba Cement Factory, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Q4 Social Sciences
D. Tesema, A. Berhanu
{"title":"Rural Livelihood Strategies and Household Food Security of Farmers Surrounding Derba Cement Factory, Oromia Region, Ethiopia","authors":"D. Tesema, A. Berhanu","doi":"10.2478/plua-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined the livelihood strategies and food security situation of rural households around Derba Cement Factory by taking a randomly selected sample of 215 heads of farm households from three rural kebeles. A mixed research approach was employed to triangulate concurrently collected data through household survey, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Informed by the sustainable rural livelihood framework, descriptive statistics were used to describe rural households’ livelihood strategies and challenges they faced while inferential statistics was employed to explain households’ food security situations with different livelihood combinations. While mixed farming was found to be the mainstay of the household economy, small-scale irrigation and extracting forest products were also used as supplementary economic activities. More than a half of the respondents (52.5%) reported at least one non-farm activity. Land shortage was identified as a major constraint to expand crop production and this was further aggravated by the activities (e.g. querying leading to displacement) of the Derba Cement Factory. This further affected household labor allocation and natural resources utilization. The result of household food (in) security access scale indicated that 59% of the respondents have experienced food access insecurity in 2016. However, respondents who combined agriculture and non-farm activities appeared relatively more food secure than those engaged in agriculture alone or in non-farm activity only. Overall, households with multiple livelihood strategies had diverse food entitlements to maintain sustainable food consumption. Yet, necessity induced diversification was found to affect food access security of households. This calls for inclusive policies and strategies that integrate rural non-farm activities to subsistence farming in order to assure sustainable livelihood in rural communities.","PeriodicalId":30922,"journal":{"name":"Rural Sustainability Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"17 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the livelihood strategies and food security situation of rural households around Derba Cement Factory by taking a randomly selected sample of 215 heads of farm households from three rural kebeles. A mixed research approach was employed to triangulate concurrently collected data through household survey, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Informed by the sustainable rural livelihood framework, descriptive statistics were used to describe rural households’ livelihood strategies and challenges they faced while inferential statistics was employed to explain households’ food security situations with different livelihood combinations. While mixed farming was found to be the mainstay of the household economy, small-scale irrigation and extracting forest products were also used as supplementary economic activities. More than a half of the respondents (52.5%) reported at least one non-farm activity. Land shortage was identified as a major constraint to expand crop production and this was further aggravated by the activities (e.g. querying leading to displacement) of the Derba Cement Factory. This further affected household labor allocation and natural resources utilization. The result of household food (in) security access scale indicated that 59% of the respondents have experienced food access insecurity in 2016. However, respondents who combined agriculture and non-farm activities appeared relatively more food secure than those engaged in agriculture alone or in non-farm activity only. Overall, households with multiple livelihood strategies had diverse food entitlements to maintain sustainable food consumption. Yet, necessity induced diversification was found to affect food access security of households. This calls for inclusive policies and strategies that integrate rural non-farm activities to subsistence farming in order to assure sustainable livelihood in rural communities.
埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州德尔巴水泥厂周边农民的农村生计策略与家庭粮食安全
摘要本研究随机抽取三个乡镇的215户农户为样本,调查了德尔巴水泥厂周边农户的生计策略和粮食安全状况。采用混合研究方法,通过家庭调查、关键线人访谈和焦点小组讨论,对同时收集的数据进行三角分析。在可持续农村生计框架的指导下,描述性统计数据被用来描述农村家庭的生计战略和他们面临的挑战,而推理统计数据则被用来解释不同生计组合的家庭的粮食安全状况。虽然混合农业被认为是家庭经济的支柱,但小规模灌溉和开采森林产品也被用作补充经济活动。超过一半的受访者(52.5%)报告至少有一项非农业活动。土地短缺被确定为扩大作物生产的一个主要制约因素,而德尔巴水泥厂的活动(例如导致流离失所的查询)进一步加剧了这一制约因素。这进一步影响了家庭劳动力配置和自然资源利用。家庭粮食安全获取量表的结果表明,59%的受访者在2016年经历过粮食获取不安全。然而,将农业和非农业活动相结合的受访者似乎比单独从事农业或仅从事非农业活动的受访者相对更安全。总体而言,有多种生计战略的家庭享有不同的粮食权利,以维持可持续的粮食消费。然而,人们发现,必需品引发的多样化会影响家庭的粮食获取安全。这就要求制定包容性政策和战略,将农村非农活动与自给农业结合起来,以确保农村社区的可持续生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural Sustainability Research
Rural Sustainability Research Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信