Comparison of Two Different Protocols for the Treatment of Acute Escherichia coli Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Q2 Veterinary
Vahideh Hamidi-Sofiani, H. Hamali, K. Nofouzi
{"title":"Comparison of Two Different Protocols for the Treatment of Acute Escherichia coli Mastitis in Dairy Cattle","authors":"Vahideh Hamidi-Sofiani, H. Hamali, K. Nofouzi","doi":"10.6000/1927-520X.2017.06.02.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-coli mastitis is one of the most frequent causes of environmental mastitis in the dairy cattle worldwide. The purpose of this field study was to compare the efficacy of ceftiofur (HCL) in conjunction with supportive measures versus supportive measures alone for treatment of dairy cows affected with naturally occurring acute form of E. coli mastitis. From January 2014 to December 2016 a total number of 100 cows naturally affected by acute E-coli mastitis randomly were allocated into two groups. A milk sample from the affected quarter was collected for bacteriological tests on the first day of treatment. In group A (control), fifty cows received ceftiofur (HCL) 1mg/5kg/BW, flunixin meglumine 2.2mg/kg, calcium borogluconate 40%, 250ml and hypertonic saline (Nacl 7.2 %,) 5ml/kg. In group B (treatment, n=50), cows received the same drugs mentioned for group A, except ceftiofur (HCL) which replaced by placebo. In the group A, 41cows (82%) and in the group B, 2 cows (4%) were survived respectively. The rates of quarter health recovery in the groups A and B were 31.7% and 0% respectively. The differences between two groups were significant (P≤0.01). In conclusion our results indicated that treatment of cows affected with naturally occurring acute form of E. coli mastitis without application of effective antibiotic(s) such as ceftiofur (HCL) and fluid therapy almost impossible.","PeriodicalId":36721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Buffalo Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Buffalo Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2017.06.02.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-coli mastitis is one of the most frequent causes of environmental mastitis in the dairy cattle worldwide. The purpose of this field study was to compare the efficacy of ceftiofur (HCL) in conjunction with supportive measures versus supportive measures alone for treatment of dairy cows affected with naturally occurring acute form of E. coli mastitis. From January 2014 to December 2016 a total number of 100 cows naturally affected by acute E-coli mastitis randomly were allocated into two groups. A milk sample from the affected quarter was collected for bacteriological tests on the first day of treatment. In group A (control), fifty cows received ceftiofur (HCL) 1mg/5kg/BW, flunixin meglumine 2.2mg/kg, calcium borogluconate 40%, 250ml and hypertonic saline (Nacl 7.2 %,) 5ml/kg. In group B (treatment, n=50), cows received the same drugs mentioned for group A, except ceftiofur (HCL) which replaced by placebo. In the group A, 41cows (82%) and in the group B, 2 cows (4%) were survived respectively. The rates of quarter health recovery in the groups A and B were 31.7% and 0% respectively. The differences between two groups were significant (P≤0.01). In conclusion our results indicated that treatment of cows affected with naturally occurring acute form of E. coli mastitis without application of effective antibiotic(s) such as ceftiofur (HCL) and fluid therapy almost impossible.
两种不同方案治疗奶牛急性大肠杆菌性乳腺炎的比较
大肠杆菌乳腺炎是世界范围内奶牛环境性乳腺炎最常见的病因之一。本实地研究的目的是比较头孢噻呋(HCL)联合支持措施与单独支持措施对奶牛天然急性大肠杆菌乳腺炎的治疗效果。选取2014年1月至2016年12月自然感染急性大肠杆菌乳腺炎的奶牛100头,随机分为两组。在治疗的第一天,从受影响地区收集牛奶样本进行细菌学测试。A组(对照组)50头奶牛,分别给予头孢替弗(HCL) 1mg/5kg/BW、氟尼新- meumine 2.2mg/kg、硼葡萄糖酸钙40% 250ml和高渗盐水(Nacl 7.2%) 5ml/kg。在B组(治疗,n=50),奶牛服用与A组相同的药物,但用安慰剂代替头孢替弗(盐酸)。A组成活率为41头(82%),B组成活率为2头(4%)。A组和B组的季度健康恢复率分别为31.7%和0%。两组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,如果不使用有效的抗生素,如头孢替福(HCL)和液体疗法,几乎不可能治疗感染自然发生的急性大肠杆菌乳腺炎的奶牛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Buffalo Science
Journal of Buffalo Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信