Analgesic efficacy of pre-emptive ultrasound-guided mid-point transverse process to pleura block for patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy incisions: Randomized controlled trial

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heba Abdelhamid Mohammed, A. M. Belal, R. S. Elkalla, S. Soliman
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of pre-emptive ultrasound-guided mid-point transverse process to pleura block for patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy incisions: Randomized controlled trial","authors":"Heba Abdelhamid Mohammed, A. M. Belal, R. S. Elkalla, S. Soliman","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2231709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background For anesthesiologists, managing pain during and after thoracic surgery remains a significant challenge. This research aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided pre-emptive mid-point transverse process to pleura (MTP) block for posterolateral thoracotomy. Methods This prospective randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 70 patients scheduled for a posterolateral thoracotomy operation under general anesthesia (GA). Patients were classified randomly and equally into Group I (MTP group) received MTP blocks, and Group II (sham block) received 2 ml of saline solution. The blocks were done after induction of GA but before the skin incision. Results Numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and cough, total morphine consumption, the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months, and undesirable side effects (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression) were significantly lower in MTP block than in sham block. Oxygen saturation and SpO2/FiO2 raised significantly in the MTP block than in the sham block (P < 0.001). Conclusions The US-guided MTP block provided effective analgesia with a lower pain score, lesser rescue analgesics consumption, and reduced risk of developing chronic pain posterolateral thoracotomy.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2231709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background For anesthesiologists, managing pain during and after thoracic surgery remains a significant challenge. This research aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided pre-emptive mid-point transverse process to pleura (MTP) block for posterolateral thoracotomy. Methods This prospective randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 70 patients scheduled for a posterolateral thoracotomy operation under general anesthesia (GA). Patients were classified randomly and equally into Group I (MTP group) received MTP blocks, and Group II (sham block) received 2 ml of saline solution. The blocks were done after induction of GA but before the skin incision. Results Numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and cough, total morphine consumption, the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months, and undesirable side effects (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression) were significantly lower in MTP block than in sham block. Oxygen saturation and SpO2/FiO2 raised significantly in the MTP block than in the sham block (P < 0.001). Conclusions The US-guided MTP block provided effective analgesia with a lower pain score, lesser rescue analgesics consumption, and reduced risk of developing chronic pain posterolateral thoracotomy.
超声引导下胸膜中点横突阻断对后外侧开胸切口患者的镇痛效果:随机对照试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信