Psychometric Properties of 20-Item and 10-Item Persian Versions of Drug Abuse Screening Test

Q3 Nursing
S. Fatemi, R. Soleimani, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Hassan Novin, E. Abdollahi
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of 20-Item and 10-Item Persian Versions of Drug Abuse Screening Test","authors":"S. Fatemi, R. Soleimani, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Hassan Novin, E. Abdollahi","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.32.3.2366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Substance use disorder is one of the most critical social problems in Iran. For this disorder, weneed a proper assessment tool based on our indigenous culture. Objective: This study assesses the factor structure and psychometric properties of 10-item and 20-item Persian versions of Drug Abuse Screening Tests (DAST-10 and DAST-20). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we randomly selected 200 participants referred to addiction treatment centers in Rasht City, Iran. After translation to Persian and back-translation to English, the face and content validity of DAST-10 and DAST-20 Persian versions were evaluated using the opinions of a panel of expertsand calculatingthe content validity ratio and content validity index. Then, the construct validity was evaluated by Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the Cronbach α coefficient was used for assessing internal consistency, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used for assessing test-retest reliability. Results: The Mean±SD age of participants was 39.02±11.67 years. The majority (50%) were in the age range of 30-50 years. Based on the CFA fit indices, the two instruments had a good fit to the data, confirming the theoretical model Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) (RMSEA for DAST-20=0.080; RMSEA for DAST-10=0.055). The Cronbach α values ​​of DAST-20 and DAST-10 were 0.772 and 0.749, respectively, indicating their good and acceptable internal consistency. Their test-retest reliability was reported at 0.997 and 0.995 based on the results of ICC, respectively. There was a strong and significant positive correlation between the scores of Persian DAST-20 and DAST-10 (r=0.851, P=0.001). Conclusion: The DAST-20 and DAST-10 Persian versions which after correcting the model using confirmatory factor analysis, they were studies in DAST-8 and DAST-16 have good validity and reliability and can be used for screening the possible involvement of drugs in Iranian samples.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.32.3.2366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Substance use disorder is one of the most critical social problems in Iran. For this disorder, weneed a proper assessment tool based on our indigenous culture. Objective: This study assesses the factor structure and psychometric properties of 10-item and 20-item Persian versions of Drug Abuse Screening Tests (DAST-10 and DAST-20). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we randomly selected 200 participants referred to addiction treatment centers in Rasht City, Iran. After translation to Persian and back-translation to English, the face and content validity of DAST-10 and DAST-20 Persian versions were evaluated using the opinions of a panel of expertsand calculatingthe content validity ratio and content validity index. Then, the construct validity was evaluated by Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the Cronbach α coefficient was used for assessing internal consistency, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used for assessing test-retest reliability. Results: The Mean±SD age of participants was 39.02±11.67 years. The majority (50%) were in the age range of 30-50 years. Based on the CFA fit indices, the two instruments had a good fit to the data, confirming the theoretical model Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) (RMSEA for DAST-20=0.080; RMSEA for DAST-10=0.055). The Cronbach α values ​​of DAST-20 and DAST-10 were 0.772 and 0.749, respectively, indicating their good and acceptable internal consistency. Their test-retest reliability was reported at 0.997 and 0.995 based on the results of ICC, respectively. There was a strong and significant positive correlation between the scores of Persian DAST-20 and DAST-10 (r=0.851, P=0.001). Conclusion: The DAST-20 and DAST-10 Persian versions which after correcting the model using confirmatory factor analysis, they were studies in DAST-8 and DAST-16 have good validity and reliability and can be used for screening the possible involvement of drugs in Iranian samples.
20题和10题波斯语药物滥用筛选测验的心理测量学性质
引言:物质使用障碍是伊朗最严重的社会问题之一。对于这种障碍,我们需要一个基于我们本土文化的适当评估工具。目的:本研究评估了10项和20项波斯版药物滥用筛查测试(DAST-10和DAST-20)的因子结构和心理测量特性。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们随机选择了200名被推荐到伊朗拉什特市成瘾治疗中心的参与者。在翻译成波斯语和反译成英语后,使用专家小组的意见对DAST-10和DAST-20波斯语版本的正面和内容有效性进行评估,并计算内容有效率和内容有效指数。然后,通过确证因子分析(CFA)评估结构的有效性,Cronbachα系数用于评估内部一致性,组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估重测的可靠性。结果:参与者的平均±SD年龄为39.02±11.67岁。大多数(50%)年龄在30-50岁之间。基于CFA拟合指数,两种仪器与数据拟合良好,证实了理论模型均方根误差近似(RMSEA)(DAST-20的RMSEA=0.080;DAST-10的RMSEA=0.055)​​DAST-20和DAST-10的内部一致性分别为0.772和0.749,表明它们具有良好的可接受内部一致性。根据ICC的结果,他们的重测可靠性分别为0.997和0.995。波斯DAST-20和DAST-10的得分之间存在强而显著的正相关(r=0.851,P=0.001),DAST-8和DAST-16的研究具有良好的有效性和可靠性,可用于筛选伊朗样本中可能涉及的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信