Tip orientation under real-time point-of-care neck ultrasonic monitoring is advantageous in peripherally inserted central catheter procedures: a retrospective cohort study

Shuiqing Liu, Shao-wei Jiang, Jing Ma, Feng Qian, Chengjin Gao
{"title":"Tip orientation under real-time point-of-care neck ultrasonic monitoring is advantageous in peripherally inserted central catheter procedures: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Shuiqing Liu, Shao-wei Jiang, Jing Ma, Feng Qian, Chengjin Gao","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background We analyzed the success and catheter tip malposition rates of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement using ultrasonic monitoring. Methods A total of 564 patients were recruited and assigned to either the intervention or control group. In the intervention group, 282 patients underwent ultrasound-guided PICC insertion, which helped to identify the position and depth of the catheter tip. From a total of 9000 patients, 282 were selectively chosen to receive the traditional method using body surface measurements (control group). The primary endpoint was the success rate; the secondary endpoint was the catheter tip malposition rate as detected by postprocedure chest radiography. Results In the intervention group, a total of 94 catheters were in a suboptimal position; 26 were too deep, 68 were too shallow, and 1 was inserted into the subclavian vein, with success and malposition rates of 66.3% and 0.4%, respectively. In the control group, 139 catheters were in a suboptimal position; 88 were too deep, 51 were too shallow, 9 were inserted into the jugular vein, and 2 were inserted into the subclavian vein, with success and malposition rates of 46.8% (P < 0.001) and 3.9% (P = 0.004), respectively. Significant differences were observed in success and malposition rates between the 2 groups. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided PICC procedures achieved higher success rates and lower malposition rates.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background We analyzed the success and catheter tip malposition rates of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement using ultrasonic monitoring. Methods A total of 564 patients were recruited and assigned to either the intervention or control group. In the intervention group, 282 patients underwent ultrasound-guided PICC insertion, which helped to identify the position and depth of the catheter tip. From a total of 9000 patients, 282 were selectively chosen to receive the traditional method using body surface measurements (control group). The primary endpoint was the success rate; the secondary endpoint was the catheter tip malposition rate as detected by postprocedure chest radiography. Results In the intervention group, a total of 94 catheters were in a suboptimal position; 26 were too deep, 68 were too shallow, and 1 was inserted into the subclavian vein, with success and malposition rates of 66.3% and 0.4%, respectively. In the control group, 139 catheters were in a suboptimal position; 88 were too deep, 51 were too shallow, 9 were inserted into the jugular vein, and 2 were inserted into the subclavian vein, with success and malposition rates of 46.8% (P < 0.001) and 3.9% (P = 0.004), respectively. Significant differences were observed in success and malposition rates between the 2 groups. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided PICC procedures achieved higher success rates and lower malposition rates.
实时护理点颈部超声监测下的尖端定向在周围插入中心导管手术中是有利的:一项回顾性队列研究
摘要背景应用超声监测方法分析外周中心导管(PICC)置放成功率及导管尖端错位率。方法将564例患者分为干预组和对照组。干预组282例患者行超声引导下PICC插入,有助于确定导管尖端的位置和深度。从9000例患者中选择性选择282例采用体表测量的传统方法(对照组)。主要终点是成功率;次要终点是术后胸片检测到的导管尖端错位率。结果干预组共94根导管处于次优位置;过深26例,过浅68例,插入锁骨下静脉1例,成功率66.3%,错位率0.4%。对照组有139根导管处于次优位置;过深88例,过浅51例,插入颈静脉9例,插入锁骨下静脉2例,成功率46.8% (P < 0.001),错位率3.9% (P = 0.004)。两组手术成功率和手术位错率比较,差异均有统计学意义。结论超声引导下PICC手术成功率高,位错率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信