Fragiles but Resilient. The Key Strategies to Cope with Pandemic in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. A Controlled Web Survey

A. Sgoifo, Maria Raffaella Marazzi, Emanuela Laura Susani, L. Saraceno, M. G. Esposito, Concetta Campagna, E. Agostoni, A. Protti
{"title":"Fragiles but Resilient. The Key Strategies to Cope with Pandemic in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. A Controlled Web Survey","authors":"A. Sgoifo, Maria Raffaella Marazzi, Emanuela Laura Susani, L. Saraceno, M. G. Esposito, Concetta Campagna, E. Agostoni, A. Protti","doi":"10.14302/issn.2470-5020.jnrt-22-4106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSARS-CoV-2 pandemic represented an unexpected psychological stress, being a major threat to health and limiting daily’s life, especially for the fragile population. How could the people with (pw) Multiple Sclerosis (MS) cope with this emergency?\n\nObjective\nTo observe the pwMS’s psychological reaction in comparison with non affected persons and to evaluate the impact of lifestyle changes on psychological symptoms, due to the pandemic.\n\nMethods\nThe study was observational, retrospective, controlled, focused on good clinical practice and conducted at Niguarda Hospital. PwMS and controls filled a web survey containing anamnestic data, habits, depression and anxiety self-questionnaires. The primary outcome was the pwMS’s psychological anxiety and depression score compared with controls.\n\nResults\nOn April, 10 2020, 88/165 pwMS and 187 controls joined the study. Unexpectedly, no significant differences between groups were observed for depression mean score: 6.6(5.2) in pwMS and 6.2(4.8) in controls and for anxiety: 5.9(4.8) and 5.0(4.2). PwMS focused on health concern more often than controls, but they respected the restrictions more easily and benefited from practical activities more than controls.\n\nConclusion\nPwMS showed a proper psychological resilience in comparison with controls. These findings might guide the clinical interviews and suggest both the areas to be supported and the strengths to be promoted in pwMS.","PeriodicalId":91754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological research and therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological research and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2470-5020.jnrt-22-4106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background SARS-CoV-2 pandemic represented an unexpected psychological stress, being a major threat to health and limiting daily’s life, especially for the fragile population. How could the people with (pw) Multiple Sclerosis (MS) cope with this emergency? Objective To observe the pwMS’s psychological reaction in comparison with non affected persons and to evaluate the impact of lifestyle changes on psychological symptoms, due to the pandemic. Methods The study was observational, retrospective, controlled, focused on good clinical practice and conducted at Niguarda Hospital. PwMS and controls filled a web survey containing anamnestic data, habits, depression and anxiety self-questionnaires. The primary outcome was the pwMS’s psychological anxiety and depression score compared with controls. Results On April, 10 2020, 88/165 pwMS and 187 controls joined the study. Unexpectedly, no significant differences between groups were observed for depression mean score: 6.6(5.2) in pwMS and 6.2(4.8) in controls and for anxiety: 5.9(4.8) and 5.0(4.2). PwMS focused on health concern more often than controls, but they respected the restrictions more easily and benefited from practical activities more than controls. Conclusion PwMS showed a proper psychological resilience in comparison with controls. These findings might guide the clinical interviews and suggest both the areas to be supported and the strengths to be promoted in pwMS.
脆弱但坚韧。应对多发性硬化症患者流行病的关键策略。一项受控的网络调查
sars - cov -2大流行代表了一种意想不到的心理压力,是对健康的重大威胁,限制了日常生活,特别是对脆弱人群。患有多发性硬化症(MS)的人如何应对这种紧急情况?目的观察新冠肺炎患者与非感染者的心理反应,评价生活方式改变对心理症状的影响。方法采用观察性、回顾性、对照、注重临床实践的研究方法,在尼瓜达医院进行。PwMS和对照组填写了一份网络调查,其中包括记忆数据、习惯、抑郁和焦虑自我问卷。主要结果是与对照组相比,pwMS的心理焦虑和抑郁评分。结果2020年4月10日,88/165名pwMS和187名对照组加入研究。出乎意料的是,各组之间在抑郁平均得分方面没有显著差异:pwMS组为6.6分(5.2分),对照组为6.2分(4.8分);焦虑组为5.9分(4.8分),对照组为5.0分(4.2分)。与控制措施相比,工事管理措施更多地关注健康问题,但它们更容易尊重限制措施,并且比控制措施更能从实际活动中获益。结论与对照组相比,pwms患者表现出良好的心理弹性。这些发现可以指导临床访谈,并建议在pwMS中需要支持的领域和需要提升的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书