Book Review: The Invention of the ‘Underclass’: A Study in the Politics of Knowledge by Loïc Wacquant

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
S. Crossley
{"title":"Book Review: The Invention of the ‘Underclass’: A Study in the Politics of Knowledge by Loïc Wacquant","authors":"S. Crossley","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"state (ageing, employment, climate change); two broad policy strategies (social investment/asset-based welfare; universal basic income); and three writers (Milanovic; Piketty; Gough). These are certainly all relevant for CSP readers, presented more as summaries rather than building an integrated social democratic proposition for the next welfare state. It is good to see Ian Gough’s vision of a decarbonised welfare state being advocated for social democracy, but the author is right to conclude (p. 110) that it would require ‘steep taxation of inheritance, land, and capital transfers and ... building up the state’s store of public capital’. The author is sanguine in bemoaning the likely political unfeasibility of such proposals, regrettably. Chapter 5 reviews the first year of COVID in terms of its socio-economic impact and government policies, which is useful. Oddly, perhaps the author focuses on ‘the one area in which the government ...performed relatively well’ i.e. support for businesses and individuals. There is just one paragraph on the epidemiological impact, while several pages are devoted to the fiscal and macroeconomic impact. It is not clear what social forces in the author’s view are going to shape the next welfare state, particularly on the Left. The implications of the climate crisis are certainly considered, and occasionally the decline of the trade union movement is bemoaned without going further into its impact on the past and future of the welfare state. However, there is no mention of perspectives and pressures emanating from the women’s movement or Black Lives Matter, for example. The implications for the next welfare state of the new authoritarian/libertarian populism on the political right are not considered. It would also have been useful to have had some discussion of the moral and economic arguments for reducing inequality, revisiting Wilkinson and Pickett, and of the role, extent, and design of basic services as proposed for example by Coote and Percy. Both these texts are cited but not really more than that. This book sets itself quite severe limitations of perspective and scope, which many CSP readers might find problematic, but within those constraints it offers some thoughtful and accessible discussion.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"560 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

state (ageing, employment, climate change); two broad policy strategies (social investment/asset-based welfare; universal basic income); and three writers (Milanovic; Piketty; Gough). These are certainly all relevant for CSP readers, presented more as summaries rather than building an integrated social democratic proposition for the next welfare state. It is good to see Ian Gough’s vision of a decarbonised welfare state being advocated for social democracy, but the author is right to conclude (p. 110) that it would require ‘steep taxation of inheritance, land, and capital transfers and ... building up the state’s store of public capital’. The author is sanguine in bemoaning the likely political unfeasibility of such proposals, regrettably. Chapter 5 reviews the first year of COVID in terms of its socio-economic impact and government policies, which is useful. Oddly, perhaps the author focuses on ‘the one area in which the government ...performed relatively well’ i.e. support for businesses and individuals. There is just one paragraph on the epidemiological impact, while several pages are devoted to the fiscal and macroeconomic impact. It is not clear what social forces in the author’s view are going to shape the next welfare state, particularly on the Left. The implications of the climate crisis are certainly considered, and occasionally the decline of the trade union movement is bemoaned without going further into its impact on the past and future of the welfare state. However, there is no mention of perspectives and pressures emanating from the women’s movement or Black Lives Matter, for example. The implications for the next welfare state of the new authoritarian/libertarian populism on the political right are not considered. It would also have been useful to have had some discussion of the moral and economic arguments for reducing inequality, revisiting Wilkinson and Pickett, and of the role, extent, and design of basic services as proposed for example by Coote and Percy. Both these texts are cited but not really more than that. This book sets itself quite severe limitations of perspective and scope, which many CSP readers might find problematic, but within those constraints it offers some thoughtful and accessible discussion.
书评:“底层阶级”的发明:知识政治研究Loïc Wacquant著
国家(老龄化、就业、气候变化);两大政策策略(社会投资/基于资产的福利;全民基本收入);和三位作家(米兰诺维奇;Piketty;高夫)。这些当然都与CSP的读者相关,更多的是作为总结,而不是为下一个福利国家建立一个综合的社会民主主张。很高兴看到伊恩·高夫(Ian Gough)关于低碳福利国家的设想被社会民主主义所倡导,但作者得出的结论(第110页)是正确的,即这将需要“对遗产、土地和资本转移征收高额税收……建立国家公共资本储备。遗憾的是,作者乐观地哀叹这些提议可能在政治上不可行。第5章从疫情的社会经济影响和政府政策方面回顾了疫情第一年的情况,这是有益的。奇怪的是,也许作者关注的是“政府……表现相对较好”,即对企业和个人的支持。只有一段是关于流行病影响的,而几页是关于财政和宏观经济影响的。在作者看来,什么样的社会力量将塑造下一个福利国家尚不清楚,尤其是在左翼方面。气候危机的影响当然会被考虑,偶尔也会哀叹工会运动的衰落,而没有进一步探讨它对福利国家的过去和未来的影响。然而,书中并没有提到来自妇女运动或黑人的命也是命等运动的观点和压力。没有考虑政治右翼的新威权主义/自由主义民粹主义对下一个福利国家的影响。对减少不平等的道德和经济论据进行一些讨论,重新审视威尔金森和皮克特,以及库特和珀西等人提出的基本服务的作用、范围和设计,也会有所帮助。这两篇文章都被引用了,但仅此而已。这本书在观点和范围上设置了相当严格的限制,许多CSP读者可能会觉得有问题,但在这些限制范围内,它提供了一些深思熟虑且易于理解的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信