AS MARCAS DE CORREÇÃO TEXTUAL: ANÁLISE DE PRODUÇÕES TEXTUAIS CORRIGIDAS POR PROFESSORES DE QUINTOS ANOS DO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL

Ana Luzia Videira Parisotto, Clara Sanches Sebastião
{"title":"AS MARCAS DE CORREÇÃO TEXTUAL: ANÁLISE DE PRODUÇÕES TEXTUAIS CORRIGIDAS POR PROFESSORES DE QUINTOS ANOS DO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL","authors":"Ana Luzia Videira Parisotto, Clara Sanches Sebastião","doi":"10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article brings some results of a scientific research (Fapesp/Process 2021/06003-8), which investigated the limits and potentialities of the textual correction marks left by teachers in texts productions of fourth and fifth grades of Elementary School. We delimited for this piece only the analysis of data related to the marks of correction in texts produced by students of the fifth grade of Elementary School. In this way, we aimed to verify the teacher correction marks in fifth grade students' texts, describe and analyze the types of textual correction identified in the corpus in the light of Serafini's (1995) and Ruiz's (2020) studies, and reflect on the potential contributions to text review that go beyond the orthographic-grammatical dimension. This investigation is characterized as qualitative research (GODOY, 1995), with a descriptive-analytical focus (MARTINS, 2008) on aspects related to the correction and evaluation of twenty written productions from the FPPEEBS Research Group writing bank. That said, the results indicate that depending on the type of correction that the teacher takes as a tool to mark the student's text, he can, by means of a dialogical interaction, of the teacher-reader and student-author, guide to a next stage in the process of textual production, the rewriting, stimulating the autonomy and active action of the student; on the other side, he can suppress the interactive character of the text taking the correction as a monologue, a sanitizing practice, of \"hunting mistakes\", and thus restrict the student's action.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium Humanarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article brings some results of a scientific research (Fapesp/Process 2021/06003-8), which investigated the limits and potentialities of the textual correction marks left by teachers in texts productions of fourth and fifth grades of Elementary School. We delimited for this piece only the analysis of data related to the marks of correction in texts produced by students of the fifth grade of Elementary School. In this way, we aimed to verify the teacher correction marks in fifth grade students' texts, describe and analyze the types of textual correction identified in the corpus in the light of Serafini's (1995) and Ruiz's (2020) studies, and reflect on the potential contributions to text review that go beyond the orthographic-grammatical dimension. This investigation is characterized as qualitative research (GODOY, 1995), with a descriptive-analytical focus (MARTINS, 2008) on aspects related to the correction and evaluation of twenty written productions from the FPPEEBS Research Group writing bank. That said, the results indicate that depending on the type of correction that the teacher takes as a tool to mark the student's text, he can, by means of a dialogical interaction, of the teacher-reader and student-author, guide to a next stage in the process of textual production, the rewriting, stimulating the autonomy and active action of the student; on the other side, he can suppress the interactive character of the text taking the correction as a monologue, a sanitizing practice, of "hunting mistakes", and thus restrict the student's action.
文本校正标记:小学五年级教师对文本作品校正的分析
本文提出了一项科学研究(Fapesp/Process 2021/006003-8)的一些结果,该研究调查了小学四年级和五年级教师在课文制作中留下的纠错标记的局限性和潜力。在这篇文章中,我们只对小学五年级学生的课文中与批改分数有关的数据进行了分析。通过这种方式,我们旨在验证五年级学生文本中的教师纠正分数,根据Serafini(1995)和Ruiz(2020)的研究描述和分析语料库中确定的文本纠正类型,并反思其对文本复习的潜在贡献,这些贡献超越了正字法维度。这项调查的特点是定性研究(GODOY,1995),重点是描述性分析(MARTINS,2008)与FPPEEBS研究小组写作库的20篇书面作品的更正和评估有关的方面。也就是说,研究结果表明,根据教师作为标记学生文本的工具所采取的纠正类型,他可以通过教师读者和学生作者的对话互动,引导学生进入文本生成、重写过程的下一阶段,激发学生的自主权和积极行动;另一方面,他可以抑制文本的互动性,将纠错视为独白、净化练习、“寻找错误”,从而限制学生的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信