Between Historiographies of Finitude and Appropriation of the Annales School: The “National Question” in Post-1945 Croatian Intellectual History

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Lucija Balikić
{"title":"Between Historiographies of Finitude and Appropriation of the Annales School: The “National Question” in Post-1945 Croatian Intellectual History","authors":"Lucija Balikić","doi":"10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BALIKIĆ, Lucija. Between Historiographies of Finitude and Appropriation of the Annales School: The “National Question” in Post-1945 Croatian Intellectual History. The present article outlines the main trends in post-1945 Croatian intellectual history writing, with special attention paid to the unique dynamics of the reception and influence of the Annales school, plus other external historiographical trends dominant in “Western” historiographies of the time. Moreover, the intellectual history was oftentimes written from a teleological perspective, culminating in either the people’s liberation struggle ( narodnooslobodilačka borba ) and socialist revolution, or in the making of an independent Croatian nation-state, whereby numerous ideologies were fashioned to fit these two goals. In con-trast, a more self-reflexive and open-ended intellectual history inspired by the Annales School opposed these type of schemes. Nevertheless, both historiographical traditions of the period primarily grappled with the so-called national question and the historical interplay between the Yugoslav and Croatian national movements and ideologies, debating the intellectual and social origins of the former from a zero-sum perspective, while attempting to alienate the latter from the projects of Yugoslavism and socialism in the period after the wars of the 1990s. Using primarily the example of Mirjana Gross and her treatment of the ideology of rightism ( pravaštvo ) together with the polemics she developed with other historians about its morphology and relevance for the development and content of Croatian nationalism, the article demonstrates the aforementioned argument about historiographical trends and debates, as well as their notable transformations in the given period.","PeriodicalId":37228,"journal":{"name":"Forum Historiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BALIKIĆ, Lucija. Between Historiographies of Finitude and Appropriation of the Annales School: The “National Question” in Post-1945 Croatian Intellectual History. The present article outlines the main trends in post-1945 Croatian intellectual history writing, with special attention paid to the unique dynamics of the reception and influence of the Annales school, plus other external historiographical trends dominant in “Western” historiographies of the time. Moreover, the intellectual history was oftentimes written from a teleological perspective, culminating in either the people’s liberation struggle ( narodnooslobodilačka borba ) and socialist revolution, or in the making of an independent Croatian nation-state, whereby numerous ideologies were fashioned to fit these two goals. In con-trast, a more self-reflexive and open-ended intellectual history inspired by the Annales School opposed these type of schemes. Nevertheless, both historiographical traditions of the period primarily grappled with the so-called national question and the historical interplay between the Yugoslav and Croatian national movements and ideologies, debating the intellectual and social origins of the former from a zero-sum perspective, while attempting to alienate the latter from the projects of Yugoslavism and socialism in the period after the wars of the 1990s. Using primarily the example of Mirjana Gross and her treatment of the ideology of rightism ( pravaštvo ) together with the polemics she developed with other historians about its morphology and relevance for the development and content of Croatian nationalism, the article demonstrates the aforementioned argument about historiographical trends and debates, as well as their notable transformations in the given period.
在编年史学派的有限与挪用之间——1945年后克罗地亚知识史中的“民族问题”
巴利基,露西娅。在编年史学派的有限性和挪用之间:1945年后克罗地亚知识史中的“民族问题”。本文概述了1945年后克罗地亚知识史写作的主要趋势,特别关注Annales学派接受和影响的独特动态,以及当时“西方”史学中占主导地位的其他外部史学趋势。此外,知识史往往是从目的论的角度撰写的,最终导致了人民解放斗争(narodnooslobodilačka borba)和社会主义革命,或者形成了一个独立的克罗地亚民族国家,从而形成了许多意识形态来适应这两个目标。相反,受年鉴学派启发,一部更具自我反射性和开放性的知识史反对这种类型的计划。尽管如此,这一时期的两个历史传统都主要处理所谓的民族问题以及南斯拉夫和克罗地亚民族运动和意识形态之间的历史相互作用,从零和的角度讨论前者的知识和社会起源,同时试图将后者与20世纪90年代战争后的南斯拉夫主义和社会主义项目疏远。本文主要以米尔贾娜·格罗斯(Mirjana Gross)及其对右翼意识形态(pravaštvo)的处理为例,以及她与其他历史学家就其形态及其与克罗地亚民族主义发展和内容的相关性展开的争论,论证了上述关于史学趋势和辩论的论点,以及他们在特定时期的显著转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum Historiae
Forum Historiae Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信