The New National Headache Management System is an easy solution to provide more efficient and evidence-based headache services

Alexander Gordon, D. Lashley, S. Weatherby
{"title":"The New National Headache Management System is an easy solution to provide more efficient and evidence-based headache services","authors":"Alexander Gordon, D. Lashley, S. Weatherby","doi":"10.47795/wltd2936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Headaches make up 30% of all Neurology outpatient consultations.1 There is distinct variability in the management of headaches by Neurologists, leading to unnecessary disparities in the standard of care and likelihood of response between patients. A significant proportion of patients with headache diagnoses do not receive the evidence-based treatments recommended in national or international guidelines,2 and substantial numbers of patients are not receiving preventive therapies.3  Ziegeler et al. found that a third of patients reporting to a tertiary headache centre had not received preventive therapy in line with guidelines, and half had never been prescribed a preventive treatment.2 Considering that 46% of the global adult population are estimated to have a headache disorder,4 this lack of a consistent, evidence-based approach is somewhat incongruent with the patient socio-economic impact. It is probable that lack of adherence to current headache guidelines is a multi-faceted issue. This variation in treatment (and therefore patient outcome), although unexplored,2 is not likely to be a simple educational issue. To add to this, an educational approach, in the form of seminars and workshops, does not have entirely positive evidence to support its use in implementing changes to patient care.5  It seems more probable that there are also structural issues within the health service that in some way preclude patients with headache disorders from gaining appropriate care.  For example, using only doctors to care for patients with such a common condition may cause bottle-necking in access, and may not be an appropriate use of clinical resource.  The current context of a global pandemic has shown us the importance of using the skillsets of all NHS staff working together for patient care.  For headache care this could involve greater use of nursing colleagues or allied health professionals such as Pharmacists. To facilitate such an aim, an easily used and standardised approach is essential. We believe that the guidelines from the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH),6 could facilitate such an approach.","PeriodicalId":34274,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical Neuroscience Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical Neuroscience Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47795/wltd2936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Headaches make up 30% of all Neurology outpatient consultations.1 There is distinct variability in the management of headaches by Neurologists, leading to unnecessary disparities in the standard of care and likelihood of response between patients. A significant proportion of patients with headache diagnoses do not receive the evidence-based treatments recommended in national or international guidelines,2 and substantial numbers of patients are not receiving preventive therapies.3  Ziegeler et al. found that a third of patients reporting to a tertiary headache centre had not received preventive therapy in line with guidelines, and half had never been prescribed a preventive treatment.2 Considering that 46% of the global adult population are estimated to have a headache disorder,4 this lack of a consistent, evidence-based approach is somewhat incongruent with the patient socio-economic impact. It is probable that lack of adherence to current headache guidelines is a multi-faceted issue. This variation in treatment (and therefore patient outcome), although unexplored,2 is not likely to be a simple educational issue. To add to this, an educational approach, in the form of seminars and workshops, does not have entirely positive evidence to support its use in implementing changes to patient care.5  It seems more probable that there are also structural issues within the health service that in some way preclude patients with headache disorders from gaining appropriate care.  For example, using only doctors to care for patients with such a common condition may cause bottle-necking in access, and may not be an appropriate use of clinical resource.  The current context of a global pandemic has shown us the importance of using the skillsets of all NHS staff working together for patient care.  For headache care this could involve greater use of nursing colleagues or allied health professionals such as Pharmacists. To facilitate such an aim, an easily used and standardised approach is essential. We believe that the guidelines from the British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH),6 could facilitate such an approach.
新的国家头痛管理系统是提供更有效和基于证据的头痛服务的简单解决方案
头痛占所有神经病学门诊咨询的30%。1神经学家对头痛的处理存在明显的可变性,导致患者之间在护理标准和反应可能性方面存在不必要的差异。很大一部分被诊断为头痛的患者没有接受国家或国际指南中建议的循证治疗,2并且相当多的患者没有得到预防性治疗。3 Ziegeler等人发现,三分之一向三级头痛中心报告的患者没有按照指南接受预防性治疗,其中一半从未接受过预防性治疗。2考虑到全球46%的成年人口估计患有头痛障碍,4这种缺乏一致的循证方法与患者的社会经济影响有些不协调。不遵守当前头痛指南可能是一个多方面的问题。这种治疗变化(以及患者结果),尽管尚未探索,2不太可能是一个简单的教育问题。除此之外,研讨会和讲习班形式的教育方法并没有完全积极的证据支持其在实施患者护理改革方面的使用。5似乎更有可能的是,卫生服务中也存在结构性问题,在某种程度上阻碍了头痛障碍患者获得适当的护理。例如,只使用医生来照顾患有这种常见疾病的患者可能会导致访问瓶颈,并且可能不是对临床资源的适当使用。当前全球疫情的背景向我们展示了利用所有NHS工作人员的技能共同护理患者的重要性。对于头痛护理,这可能需要更多地使用护理同事或药剂师等专职卫生人员。为了实现这一目标,一种易于使用和标准化的方法至关重要。我们相信,英国头痛研究协会(BASH)的指导方针6可以促进这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信