Democracy in practice? The Norwegian public inquiry of the Alexander L. Kielland North-Sea oil platform disaster

IF 3.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY
H. Weihe, M. Smith-Solbakken
{"title":"Democracy in practice? The Norwegian public inquiry of the Alexander L. Kielland North-Sea oil platform disaster","authors":"H. Weihe, M. Smith-Solbakken","doi":"10.1080/14767430.2021.1995688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In March 1980, the oil-platform Alexander L. Kielland capsized in the North Sea resulting in the death of 123 workers. The Norwegian inquiry into the disaster was closed to the public and the survivors' accounts of the disaster differed considerably from the official account. The inquiry was experienced as undemocratic by those who had been in the disaster. Many of them felt humiliated, claiming that their opinions were not given due weight. We argue that if the inquiry had been more transparent and inclusive, important information would have been made available that might have prevented subsequent disasters. Such transparency would be supported if disaster commissions used a critical realist version of knowledge acquisition based on a layered ontology and grounded in an epistemology that uses retroduction and judgemental rationality. In this article, critical realism is also used to justify the interdisciplinary nature of the research, which starts with historical methods.","PeriodicalId":45557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Realism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Realism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1995688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In March 1980, the oil-platform Alexander L. Kielland capsized in the North Sea resulting in the death of 123 workers. The Norwegian inquiry into the disaster was closed to the public and the survivors' accounts of the disaster differed considerably from the official account. The inquiry was experienced as undemocratic by those who had been in the disaster. Many of them felt humiliated, claiming that their opinions were not given due weight. We argue that if the inquiry had been more transparent and inclusive, important information would have been made available that might have prevented subsequent disasters. Such transparency would be supported if disaster commissions used a critical realist version of knowledge acquisition based on a layered ontology and grounded in an epistemology that uses retroduction and judgemental rationality. In this article, critical realism is also used to justify the interdisciplinary nature of the research, which starts with historical methods.
民主在实践中?挪威对亚历山大·L·基兰北海石油平台灾难的公开调查
1980年3月,北海的Alexander L. Kielland石油平台倾覆,造成123名工人死亡。挪威对这场灾难的调查不向公众开放,幸存者对灾难的描述与官方描述大相径庭。经历过这场灾难的人认为这次调查是不民主的。他们中的许多人感到羞辱,声称他们的意见没有得到应有的重视。我们认为,如果调查更加透明和包容,就可以获得重要的信息,从而可能防止随后的灾难。如果灾难委员会使用一种基于分层本体的知识获取的批判现实主义版本,并以使用还原和判断理性的认识论为基础,那么这种透明度将得到支持。在本文中,批判现实主义也被用来证明研究的跨学科性质,这是从历史方法开始的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
30.80%
发文量
26
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信