Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU-12 (new member states)

Equilibrium Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.24136/eq.2022.029
Martina Vukašina, Ines Kersan-Škabić, Edvard Orlić
{"title":"Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU-12 (new member states)","authors":"Martina Vukašina, Ines Kersan-Škabić, Edvard Orlić","doi":"10.24136/eq.2022.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) as the main instruments of cohesion policy (CP) in the EU, provide a broad source of financing opportunities for the EU member states. The biggest amount in the CP budget is oriented to convergence NUTS 2 regions that have GDP p.c. below 75% of the EU average. The new members of the EU (accessed in 2004 and 2007) had available 176.3 billion EUR in the period 2007?2013 and 217 billion EUR in the period 2014?2020. Even the absorption rate (in 2007?2013) of available ESIFs is high (above 90%), the real implications on their economies don?t come automatically and they represent the area for examination.\nPurpose of the article: The research aims to analyse the impact of ESIFs absorption in EU new member states in the period 2008?2016 on their GDP p.c. \nMethods: As the sample has time and cross-sectional dimension, the panel data in static and dynamic form is employed. The analysis covers the major part of the financial framework 2007?2013 and a part of financial perspective 2014?2020 (depending on the available data).\nFindings & value added: The results indicate that increase in ESIF p.c. for 1% will contribute to the GDP p.c. increase for 0.0053 to 0.0064 % (static model) and for 0.008% (dynamic model). Although the impact of ESIFs is significant and positive, it is quite (and unexpectedly) small, and consequently new EU member states should not rely too much on them as the source of economic progress. It is necessary that countries should focus on channeling funds into specific segments (sectors, policies) that will result in increased competitiveness of their economies. The contributions lie in creating GDP p.c. determination function; in including all new EU member states; in including more recent available data and by observing ESIFs as a part of growth model.","PeriodicalId":84667,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research background: European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) as the main instruments of cohesion policy (CP) in the EU, provide a broad source of financing opportunities for the EU member states. The biggest amount in the CP budget is oriented to convergence NUTS 2 regions that have GDP p.c. below 75% of the EU average. The new members of the EU (accessed in 2004 and 2007) had available 176.3 billion EUR in the period 2007?2013 and 217 billion EUR in the period 2014?2020. Even the absorption rate (in 2007?2013) of available ESIFs is high (above 90%), the real implications on their economies don?t come automatically and they represent the area for examination. Purpose of the article: The research aims to analyse the impact of ESIFs absorption in EU new member states in the period 2008?2016 on their GDP p.c.  Methods: As the sample has time and cross-sectional dimension, the panel data in static and dynamic form is employed. The analysis covers the major part of the financial framework 2007?2013 and a part of financial perspective 2014?2020 (depending on the available data). Findings & value added: The results indicate that increase in ESIF p.c. for 1% will contribute to the GDP p.c. increase for 0.0053 to 0.0064 % (static model) and for 0.008% (dynamic model). Although the impact of ESIFs is significant and positive, it is quite (and unexpectedly) small, and consequently new EU member states should not rely too much on them as the source of economic progress. It is necessary that countries should focus on channeling funds into specific segments (sectors, policies) that will result in increased competitiveness of their economies. The contributions lie in creating GDP p.c. determination function; in including all new EU member states; in including more recent available data and by observing ESIFs as a part of growth model.
吸收欧洲结构性和投资资金对欧盟12国(新成员国)区域发展的影响
研究背景:欧洲结构和投资基金作为欧盟凝聚力政策的主要工具,为欧盟成员国提供了广泛的融资机会。CP预算中最大的一笔用于融合NUTS 2个地区,这些地区的GDP低于欧盟平均水平的75%。欧盟新成员国(2004年和2007年加入)在2007年期间拥有1763亿欧元的可用资金?2013年和2014年的2170亿欧元?2020年。即使可用ESIF的吸收率(2007年至2013年)很高(超过90%),对其经济的真正影响也不高?它们代表了要检查的区域。文章目的:本研究旨在分析2008年期间欧盟新成员国吸收ESIF的影响?方法:由于样本具有时间和横截面维度,因此采用静态和动态形式的面板数据。该分析涵盖了2007年财务框架的主要部分?2013年和2014年财务展望的一部分?2020年(取决于可用数据)。调查结果和附加值:结果表明,ESIF p.c.增长1%将有助于GDP p.c.增长0.0053至0.0064%(静态模型)和0.008%(动态模型)。尽管ESIF的影响是显著和积极的,但它(出乎意料地)很小,因此新的欧盟成员国不应过于依赖它们作为经济进步的源泉。各国有必要专注于将资金引导到特定部门(部门、政策),以提高其经济竞争力。贡献在于创造了GDP p.c.决定函数;包括所有新的欧盟成员国;包括更新的可用数据,并通过观察ESIF作为增长模型的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信