The Tribology of the Helixes: Relations between Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
M. Amaral, Yuzhuo Cai
{"title":"The Tribology of the Helixes: Relations between Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models","authors":"M. Amaral, Yuzhuo Cai","doi":"10.1163/21971927-12340006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue attempts to advance the state-of-the-art in research on relations between Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models with the publication of Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith’s (2022) paper Triple, Quadruple, and Higher-Order Helices: Historical Phenomena and (Neo-)Evolutionary Models as well as five invited contributions that intend to respond to the arguments expressed in their paper. Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith argue that the dynamics of innovation mainly derive from the Triple Helix (e.g. universityindustry-government interactions), and Quadruple, Quintuple, and N-tuple helices can be decomposed into different combinations of interacting triple helices. They also justify their arguments from a theoretical and methodological perspective. When initially presented at the 2021 Triple Helix Conference as a keynote speech, Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith’s paper provoked active discussions. In order to continue scholarly exchanges on the topic, the editors invited international scholars, whose research interests lie on the border with helical approaches to innovation, to respond to Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith (2022) and join the discussions on relations between the different Helix models from various perspectives. By fostering discussions among leading scholars on the relations between the different Helix models, we hope readers will get to better know each of the models and thus optimise their strategies when applying them to empirical investigations and policy analyses. The papers collected in this special issue also infer a need to re-think Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models, which is also reflected in the Helix Models’ originators’ more recent (co-authored) works (Cai & Etzkowitz, 2020; Carayannis, Campbell, & Grigoroudis, 2021; Leydesdorff, 2021). Indeed, rapid changes occurred in our societies, triggered by technical advancements and","PeriodicalId":31161,"journal":{"name":"Triple Helix","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Triple Helix","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-12340006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This special issue attempts to advance the state-of-the-art in research on relations between Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models with the publication of Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith’s (2022) paper Triple, Quadruple, and Higher-Order Helices: Historical Phenomena and (Neo-)Evolutionary Models as well as five invited contributions that intend to respond to the arguments expressed in their paper. Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith argue that the dynamics of innovation mainly derive from the Triple Helix (e.g. universityindustry-government interactions), and Quadruple, Quintuple, and N-tuple helices can be decomposed into different combinations of interacting triple helices. They also justify their arguments from a theoretical and methodological perspective. When initially presented at the 2021 Triple Helix Conference as a keynote speech, Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith’s paper provoked active discussions. In order to continue scholarly exchanges on the topic, the editors invited international scholars, whose research interests lie on the border with helical approaches to innovation, to respond to Leydesdorff and Lawton Smith (2022) and join the discussions on relations between the different Helix models from various perspectives. By fostering discussions among leading scholars on the relations between the different Helix models, we hope readers will get to better know each of the models and thus optimise their strategies when applying them to empirical investigations and policy analyses. The papers collected in this special issue also infer a need to re-think Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models, which is also reflected in the Helix Models’ originators’ more recent (co-authored) works (Cai & Etzkowitz, 2020; Carayannis, Campbell, & Grigoroudis, 2021; Leydesdorff, 2021). Indeed, rapid changes occurred in our societies, triggered by technical advancements and
螺旋摩擦学:三重、四重和五重螺旋模型之间的关系
本特刊试图通过Leydesdorff和Lawton Smith(2022)的论文Triple,Quadruple,以及《高阶螺旋:历史现象和(新)进化模型》,以及五篇受邀的文章,旨在回应他们论文中表达的论点。Leydesdorff和Lawton-Smith认为,创新的动力主要来源于三重螺旋(如大学-行业-政府互动),四重、五重和N重螺旋可以分解为相互作用的三重螺旋的不同组合。他们还从理论和方法的角度证明了自己的论点。Leydesdorf和Lawton Smith的论文最初作为主题演讲在2021年三重螺旋会议上发表时,引发了积极的讨论。为了继续就这一主题进行学术交流,编辑们邀请了国际学者对Leydesdorff和Lawton Smith(2022)的回应,并从不同的角度加入关于不同螺旋模型之间关系的讨论。通过促进领先学者对不同螺旋模型之间关系的讨论,我们希望读者能够更好地了解每一个模型,从而在将其应用于实证调查和政策分析时优化其策略。本期特刊中收集的论文还推断出需要重新思考三重、四重和五重螺旋模型,这也反映在螺旋模型的创始人最近(合著)的作品中(Cai&Etzkowitz,2020;Carayannis、Campbell和Grigoroudis,2021;Leydesdorf,2021)。事实上,在技术进步和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Triple Helix
Triple Helix Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
46.20%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信