The Subject of the Discourse: Reading Online Activist Discourse for Human Capital Theory

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Paddy Gordon
{"title":"The Subject of the Discourse: Reading Online Activist Discourse for Human Capital Theory","authors":"Paddy Gordon","doi":"10.1080/20512856.2020.1849947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper contends that much of the discourse produced, received and exchanged online by ‘progressive subjects’ – activists committed to contesting oppression and examining privilege – is structured by neoliberal ideology. Human capital theory functions as the ‘interpellative arm’ of the neoliberal project, and a subject conceived as human capital is neoliberalism's discursive mark. Via the articulation and application of an innovative reading method, this paper explores some political ramifications of the neoliberal structuration of ‘progressive discourse’ in the very recent past, recognising that the relationship between subjects and discourse is complex and dialectical. This paper’s methodology is two-pronged. A method of reading for the presence of human capital theory is articulated, with six distinct markers of a subject conceived as human capital established. The reading method produces data that supports this paper’s contention: many forms of progressive discourse unwittingly reproduce neoliberal norms via the production of a subject as human capital as ‘the subject of the discourse’. Indeed, neoliberal human capital theory is a structural determinant of the progressive discourse analysed via the reading method demonstrated in this paper.","PeriodicalId":40530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20512856.2020.1849947","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20512856.2020.1849947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper contends that much of the discourse produced, received and exchanged online by ‘progressive subjects’ – activists committed to contesting oppression and examining privilege – is structured by neoliberal ideology. Human capital theory functions as the ‘interpellative arm’ of the neoliberal project, and a subject conceived as human capital is neoliberalism's discursive mark. Via the articulation and application of an innovative reading method, this paper explores some political ramifications of the neoliberal structuration of ‘progressive discourse’ in the very recent past, recognising that the relationship between subjects and discourse is complex and dialectical. This paper’s methodology is two-pronged. A method of reading for the presence of human capital theory is articulated, with six distinct markers of a subject conceived as human capital established. The reading method produces data that supports this paper’s contention: many forms of progressive discourse unwittingly reproduce neoliberal norms via the production of a subject as human capital as ‘the subject of the discourse’. Indeed, neoliberal human capital theory is a structural determinant of the progressive discourse analysed via the reading method demonstrated in this paper.
话语主体:人力资本理论的网络行动者话语解读
摘要本文认为,“进步主体”——致力于对抗压迫和审查特权的活动家——在网上产生、接收和交流的大部分话语都是由新自由主义意识形态构成的。人力资本理论是新自由主义项目的“交互手臂”,而一个被认为是人力资本的主题是新自由论的话语标记。通过一种创新的阅读方法的阐述和应用,本文探讨了最近“进步话语”的新自由主义结构的一些政治后果,认识到主体和话语之间的关系是复杂和辩证的。本文的方法是双管齐下的。阐述了一种解读人力资本理论存在的方法,并建立了一个被认为是人力资本的主题的六个不同标记。阅读方法产生的数据支持了本文的论点:许多形式的进步话语通过产生作为“话语主体”的人力资本主体,无意中再现了新自由主义规范。事实上,新自由主义人力资本理论是通过本文所展示的阅读方法分析的进步话语的结构决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信