Are we at a turning point in journal assessment? An introduction to altmetrics

Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.4067/s0719-81322020000300071
E. Krauskopf
{"title":"Are we at a turning point in journal assessment? An introduction to altmetrics","authors":"E. Krauskopf","doi":"10.4067/s0719-81322020000300071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The status of any journal in which research is published is an important issue for academics. For many years the impact factor has been the criteria of choice to infer the quality of the research being published by each journal. However, with the massification of the internet, research currently impacts well beyond the academic community. This study aims to introduce readers into other bibliometric and non-bibliometric (altmetric) indicators that provide a wider perspective about the impact any particular research outcome may have besides citations. From a geographic viewpoint, the documents published by AJVS between 2010-2019 were written by authors affiliated to institutions from 33 different countries, mostly from Chile (37%) and Mexico (24%). These two countries served as collaboration nodes for countries from America, Asia, Europe and Oceania. From an altmetric perspective, 59 documents published between 2010-2016 were mentioned at least once in one of the sources tracked, being the majority of them through social media. Of particular interest is one document that was used as a reference for a patent issued in 2017 by researchers that were not related to the document published in the journal. Unfortunately, data for the documents published between 2017-2019 were unavailable, probably due to issues with the journal title change. Nevertheless, it is fair to conclude that since research outputs have shown to have an impact well beyond academia, it may be time to reconsider how journals should be assessed in the near future. words","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0719-81322020000300071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. The status of any journal in which research is published is an important issue for academics. For many years the impact factor has been the criteria of choice to infer the quality of the research being published by each journal. However, with the massification of the internet, research currently impacts well beyond the academic community. This study aims to introduce readers into other bibliometric and non-bibliometric (altmetric) indicators that provide a wider perspective about the impact any particular research outcome may have besides citations. From a geographic viewpoint, the documents published by AJVS between 2010-2019 were written by authors affiliated to institutions from 33 different countries, mostly from Chile (37%) and Mexico (24%). These two countries served as collaboration nodes for countries from America, Asia, Europe and Oceania. From an altmetric perspective, 59 documents published between 2010-2016 were mentioned at least once in one of the sources tracked, being the majority of them through social media. Of particular interest is one document that was used as a reference for a patent issued in 2017 by researchers that were not related to the document published in the journal. Unfortunately, data for the documents published between 2017-2019 were unavailable, probably due to issues with the journal title change. Nevertheless, it is fair to conclude that since research outputs have shown to have an impact well beyond academia, it may be time to reconsider how journals should be assessed in the near future. words
分享
查看原文
我们正处于期刊评估的转折点吗?altmetrics的介绍
. 任何发表研究成果的期刊的地位对学术界来说都是一个重要的问题。多年来,影响因子一直是衡量各期刊发表的研究质量的选择标准。然而,随着互联网的大众化,研究目前的影响远远超出了学术界。本研究旨在向读者介绍其他文献计量学和非文献计量学(替代计量学)指标,这些指标提供了一个更广泛的视角,可以了解任何特定研究成果除了引用之外可能产生的影响。从地理角度来看,2010年至2019年期间,AJVS发表的文件由33个不同国家机构的作者撰写,其中大部分来自智利(37%)和墨西哥(24%)。这两个国家是美洲、亚洲、欧洲和大洋洲国家的合作节点。从另一个角度来看,2010年至2016年期间发布的59份文件在追踪的来源中至少被提及一次,其中大多数是通过社交媒体发布的。特别令人感兴趣的是,研究人员在2017年发布的一项专利中引用了一份文件,该文件与发表在该期刊上的文件无关。不幸的是,2017-2019年期间发表的文件数据不可用,可能是由于期刊标题更改的问题。然而,我们可以公平地得出这样的结论:既然研究成果已经显示出其影响远远超出了学术范畴,那么在不久的将来,也许是时候重新考虑如何评估期刊了。单词
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信