The Post-Soviet as Post-Colonial: A New Paradigm for Understanding Constitutional Dynamics in the Former Soviet Empire by William Partlett and Herbert Küpper (review)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
W. Butler
{"title":"The Post-Soviet as Post-Colonial: A New Paradigm for Understanding Constitutional Dynamics in the Former Soviet Empire by William Partlett and Herbert Küpper (review)","authors":"W. Butler","doi":"10.1353/see.2023.a897279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sarajevo’s ‘Balkan manners’, and overcome a constant sense of ‘secondariness’ in Yugoslav identity vis-à-vis the capitalist West. In addition, Jovanovic interprets the Olympic boom in Sarajevo in the context of the contemporary paradigm change in the history of Socialist Eastern Europe, which saw the West through the lens of its consumer culture, rather than through the opposition between liberal democracy and socialism. Participation in popular consumer culture therefore took priority over any political needs. The book’s key argument is that Sarajevo’s success is an example of integration set against the dominant perception of fragmentation in 1980s Yugoslavia. Contrary to this deterministic outlook, Jovanovic shows how Yugoslav identity was celebrated (Slovene skiers were Yugoslavized, for example), new technologies, tourism and advertising were championed, and the benefits were real, not just a show. Sarajevo stood at the core of ‘New Yugoslavism’, a modern, futuristic, non-national identity. This compelling study of Sarajevo’s place in Yugoslavia during the 1980s sets the prevailing view of its history, characterized by the rise of ethnonationalism across the country, against an opposing trend that emerged in major Yugoslav cities and amongst the youth. The effect of Jovanovic’s book, therefore, is to overturn all the easily-drawn links between the two (or three) events that made Sarajevo globally famous (or notorious), to expose them as tenuous, or even tendentious.","PeriodicalId":45292,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","volume":"101 1","pages":"187 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a897279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sarajevo’s ‘Balkan manners’, and overcome a constant sense of ‘secondariness’ in Yugoslav identity vis-à-vis the capitalist West. In addition, Jovanovic interprets the Olympic boom in Sarajevo in the context of the contemporary paradigm change in the history of Socialist Eastern Europe, which saw the West through the lens of its consumer culture, rather than through the opposition between liberal democracy and socialism. Participation in popular consumer culture therefore took priority over any political needs. The book’s key argument is that Sarajevo’s success is an example of integration set against the dominant perception of fragmentation in 1980s Yugoslavia. Contrary to this deterministic outlook, Jovanovic shows how Yugoslav identity was celebrated (Slovene skiers were Yugoslavized, for example), new technologies, tourism and advertising were championed, and the benefits were real, not just a show. Sarajevo stood at the core of ‘New Yugoslavism’, a modern, futuristic, non-national identity. This compelling study of Sarajevo’s place in Yugoslavia during the 1980s sets the prevailing view of its history, characterized by the rise of ethnonationalism across the country, against an opposing trend that emerged in major Yugoslav cities and amongst the youth. The effect of Jovanovic’s book, therefore, is to overturn all the easily-drawn links between the two (or three) events that made Sarajevo globally famous (or notorious), to expose them as tenuous, or even tendentious.
后苏联即后殖民:理解前苏联帝国宪政动态的新范式作者:威廉·帕特利特和赫伯特·k珀(书评)
萨拉热窝的“巴尔干礼仪”,并克服了对-à-vis资本主义西方的南斯拉夫身份的“次要”感。此外,Jovanovic在社会主义东欧历史上当代范式变化的背景下解释了萨拉热窝奥运会的繁荣,这是通过消费文化的视角看待西方,而不是通过自由民主和社会主义之间的对立。因此,参与大众消费文化优先于任何政治需要。这本书的主要论点是,萨拉热窝的成功是与20世纪80年代南斯拉夫分裂的主流观念相反的一体化的一个例子。与这种决定论的观点相反,约瓦诺维奇展示了南斯拉夫身份是如何被庆祝的(例如,斯洛文尼亚滑雪运动员被南斯拉夫化了),新技术、旅游业和广告得到了支持,这些好处是真实的,而不仅仅是一种表演。萨拉热窝站在“新南斯拉夫主义”的核心,这是一种现代的、未来的、非民族的认同。这项对1980年代萨拉热窝在南斯拉夫的地位的引人注目的研究确立了对其历史的普遍看法,其特点是民族民族主义在全国各地兴起,与南斯拉夫主要城市和青年中出现的相反趋势相反。因此,约万诺维奇的书推翻了使萨拉热窝在全球闻名(或臭名昭著)的两起(或三起)事件之间的所有容易建立的联系,揭露了它们是脆弱的,甚至是有倾向性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Review is the oldest British journal in the field, having been in existence since 1922. Edited and managed by the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, it covers not only the modern and medieval languages and literatures of the Slavonic and East European area, but also history, culture, and political studies. It is published in January, April, July, and October of each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信