Market reactions to timing and information of mandatory disclosures

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"Market reactions to timing and information of mandatory disclosures","authors":"","doi":"10.1108/jaee-06-2022-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examines whether investors value the timing and/or information of mandatory disclosures in a unique research setting of listed companies in Thailand.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt an event-study based approach. Abnormal stock returns are calculated using an OLS market model to measure market reactions to three types of mandatory reports issued by listed Thai firms: financial statements, Form 56-1 and Form 56-2. These reports are released sequentially but contain overlapping information content. Multivariate regression models are employed to examine the market reactions to these regulatory reports and explore the characteristics of firms that affect the market response.FindingsThe stock market reacts differentially to these reports. The financial statements, which are filed the earliest and are the most concise, prompt the strongest reaction. Investors similarly react significantly to Form 56-1 and Form 56-2, although Form 56-2 provides additional information beyond Form 56-1. The market reactions to small firms are stronger. Collectively, equity investors focus on the timeliness of disclosures rather than the information disclosed in the mandatory reports.Practical implicationsThe evidence provides support for ongoing regulatory initiatives aimed at improving the timeliness of mandatory disclosures in emerging economies.Originality/valuePrior studies on disclosure regulation investigate either the effect of information content or the timing of mandatory disclosures in isolation. The authors differentiate the effect of information content from disclosure timing and extend the literature by suggesting that investors incrementally value timeliness of disclosures. Investors perceive the benefit of the timely release of quantitative information compared to subsequent narrative disclosures. Between Form 56-1 and Form 56-2, the earlier release of the narrative non-financial information is incrementally traded into share prices.","PeriodicalId":45702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-06-2022-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines whether investors value the timing and/or information of mandatory disclosures in a unique research setting of listed companies in Thailand.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt an event-study based approach. Abnormal stock returns are calculated using an OLS market model to measure market reactions to three types of mandatory reports issued by listed Thai firms: financial statements, Form 56-1 and Form 56-2. These reports are released sequentially but contain overlapping information content. Multivariate regression models are employed to examine the market reactions to these regulatory reports and explore the characteristics of firms that affect the market response.FindingsThe stock market reacts differentially to these reports. The financial statements, which are filed the earliest and are the most concise, prompt the strongest reaction. Investors similarly react significantly to Form 56-1 and Form 56-2, although Form 56-2 provides additional information beyond Form 56-1. The market reactions to small firms are stronger. Collectively, equity investors focus on the timeliness of disclosures rather than the information disclosed in the mandatory reports.Practical implicationsThe evidence provides support for ongoing regulatory initiatives aimed at improving the timeliness of mandatory disclosures in emerging economies.Originality/valuePrior studies on disclosure regulation investigate either the effect of information content or the timing of mandatory disclosures in isolation. The authors differentiate the effect of information content from disclosure timing and extend the literature by suggesting that investors incrementally value timeliness of disclosures. Investors perceive the benefit of the timely release of quantitative information compared to subsequent narrative disclosures. Between Form 56-1 and Form 56-2, the earlier release of the narrative non-financial information is incrementally traded into share prices.
市场对强制披露时间和信息的反应
目的本研究考察了在泰国上市公司独特的研究环境中,投资者是否重视强制披露的时间和/或信息。设计/方法/方法作者采用了基于事件研究的方法。使用OLS市场模型计算异常股票回报,以衡量市场对泰国上市公司发布的三种强制性报告的反应:财务报表、表格56-1和表格56-2。这些报告按顺序发布,但包含重叠的信息内容。采用多元回归模型来检验市场对这些监管报告的反应,并探索影响市场反应的企业特征。发现股票市场对这些报道的反应各不相同。财务报表提交时间最早、最简洁,引起了最强烈的反应。投资者对表格56-1和表格56-2的反应类似,尽管表格56-2提供了表格56-1以外的其他信息。市场对小公司的反应更加强烈。总的来说,股权投资者关注的是披露的及时性,而不是强制性报告中披露的信息。实际含义这些证据为正在进行的旨在提高新兴经济体强制性披露及时性的监管举措提供了支持。原创性/价值先前关于披露监管的研究单独调查了信息内容的影响或强制性披露的时间。作者将信息内容的影响与披露时间区分开来,并通过建议投资者逐渐重视披露的及时性来扩展文献。与随后的叙述性披露相比,投资者认为及时发布定量信息的好处。在表56-1和表56-2之间,较早发布的叙述性非金融信息被逐步交易为股价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信