{"title":"Introducing regional self-governments in Central and Eastern Europe: Paths to success and failure","authors":"Tõnis Saarts","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2019.1598383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Only over half of the new EU member states in Eastern Europe have introduced regional self-governments. This article explores the factors that have contributed to the success or failure of regionalization. The novel contribution of the article is as follows: first, if previous studies have mainly concentrated on larger countries that have successfully regionalized, the current study explores those factors that have contributed to the failure. Second, earlier studies have been too focused on EU conditionality, whereas the current study, in applying QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis), outlines the multiple causal pathways that have lead to successful regionalization (or failure). The results of the analysis reveal that there are two pathways for successful regionalization: (1) EU-induced regionalization, or (2) the semi-regionalist pathway. Pathways leading to failure also comprise two options: (3) ‘small-size-blocked’ pathway, or (4) the ‘lack of external pressure and tradition’ pathway.","PeriodicalId":46657,"journal":{"name":"Regional and Federal Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"625 - 649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13597566.2019.1598383","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional and Federal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1598383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
ABSTRACT Only over half of the new EU member states in Eastern Europe have introduced regional self-governments. This article explores the factors that have contributed to the success or failure of regionalization. The novel contribution of the article is as follows: first, if previous studies have mainly concentrated on larger countries that have successfully regionalized, the current study explores those factors that have contributed to the failure. Second, earlier studies have been too focused on EU conditionality, whereas the current study, in applying QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis), outlines the multiple causal pathways that have lead to successful regionalization (or failure). The results of the analysis reveal that there are two pathways for successful regionalization: (1) EU-induced regionalization, or (2) the semi-regionalist pathway. Pathways leading to failure also comprise two options: (3) ‘small-size-blocked’ pathway, or (4) the ‘lack of external pressure and tradition’ pathway.
期刊介绍:
The upsurge of academic and political interest in regional and federal questions since the 1980s has been stimulated by the salience of regions in EU policy-making and the Structural Funds but also by regionalization and federalization processes in many Western states. The most striking example is the devolution occurring in the UK, but the process is at work all over Europe and in other parts of the world. These developments have led to many important research programmes and projects. Regional and Federal Studies is a refereed social science journal which provides an academic forum for the publication of international research on these issues. It is essential reading for both academics and practitioners in politics, administration and the business world.