Bibliometric approach to inclusive entrepreneurship: what has been written in scientific academia?

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
M. Rodrigues, Rui Silva, Mário Franco, Cidália Oliveira
{"title":"Bibliometric approach to inclusive entrepreneurship: what has been written in scientific academia?","authors":"M. Rodrigues, Rui Silva, Mário Franco, Cidália Oliveira","doi":"10.1108/cms-01-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe year 2020 was heavily marked by an unprecedented pandemic affecting society as a whole. However, under-represented groups may have seen their financial and social situation affected differently from other groups. Thus, it was found that in the literature, the term inclusive entrepreneurship, which addresses these issues, was fragmented in view of its similarity and association with social entrepreneurship, inclusive business and sustainability. In this sense, this paper aims to map the scientific knowledge on this topic.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo fulfil this aim, a systematic literature review was supported by bibliometrics (performance analysis and scientific mapping) and by the use of the software Bibliometrix R and VoSviewer.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results obtained show that in the Web of Science, there are 121 documents related to this topic whose content analysis revealed that they are distributed between sustainability, entrepreneurship and inclusive entrepreneurship in the close triple association.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe main contributions of this study are the connection established between the three concepts and the emergence of continuing to develop research on inclusive entrepreneurship, given its binary function: employment generation for disadvantaged groups and inclusive business creation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe relevance of this bibliometric analysis stands out, providing the positioning of academics on the importance of leveraging emerging research on this topic, not only in poor countries but also in others.\n","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-01-2022-0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The year 2020 was heavily marked by an unprecedented pandemic affecting society as a whole. However, under-represented groups may have seen their financial and social situation affected differently from other groups. Thus, it was found that in the literature, the term inclusive entrepreneurship, which addresses these issues, was fragmented in view of its similarity and association with social entrepreneurship, inclusive business and sustainability. In this sense, this paper aims to map the scientific knowledge on this topic. Design/methodology/approach To fulfil this aim, a systematic literature review was supported by bibliometrics (performance analysis and scientific mapping) and by the use of the software Bibliometrix R and VoSviewer. Findings The results obtained show that in the Web of Science, there are 121 documents related to this topic whose content analysis revealed that they are distributed between sustainability, entrepreneurship and inclusive entrepreneurship in the close triple association. Practical implications The main contributions of this study are the connection established between the three concepts and the emergence of continuing to develop research on inclusive entrepreneurship, given its binary function: employment generation for disadvantaged groups and inclusive business creation. Originality/value The relevance of this bibliometric analysis stands out, providing the positioning of academics on the importance of leveraging emerging research on this topic, not only in poor countries but also in others.
包容性创业的文献计量方法:科学学术界写了什么?
2020年,一场前所未有的流行病严重影响了整个社会。然而,代表性不足的群体可能看到他们的财务和社会状况受到的影响与其他群体不同。因此,我们发现,在文献中,解决这些问题的包容性创业一词,鉴于其与社会创业、包容性商业和可持续性的相似性和联系,是碎片化的。从这个意义上说,本文旨在绘制关于这一主题的科学知识。设计/方法/方法为了实现这一目标,系统的文献综述采用文献计量学(性能分析和科学制图),并使用Bibliometrix R和VoSviewer软件。结果表明,在Web of Science中,与该主题相关的文献有121篇,其内容分析显示,它们分布在可持续性、企业家精神和包容性企业家精神之间,呈密切的三重关联。本研究的主要贡献在于建立了这三个概念之间的联系,并考虑到包容性创业的二元功能:为弱势群体创造就业机会和包容性创业。独创性/价值这一文献计量分析的相关性非常突出,它为学术界提供了定位,说明利用这一主题的新兴研究的重要性,不仅在贫穷国家,而且在其他国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信