Biological prosthesis, platelet enriched plasma and bone marrow stem cells in complicated incisional hernia reconstruction in emergency surgery: a prospective case control study

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
F. Coccolini, F. Paratore, D. Tartaglia, C. Cremonini, G. Zocco, L. Cobuccio, M. Chiarugi
{"title":"Biological prosthesis, platelet enriched plasma and bone marrow stem cells in complicated incisional hernia reconstruction in emergency surgery: a prospective case control study","authors":"F. Coccolini, F. Paratore, D. Tartaglia, C. Cremonini, G. Zocco, L. Cobuccio, M. Chiarugi","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.11050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous innovations have been aided by abdominal wall surgical repair. Abdominal wall surgery was drastically altered by synthetic materials. Tissue engineering was unquestionably first applied to biomaterials. The purpose of the present study is to compare different repeating approaches with rising tissue engineering complexity in repairing complex incisional hernia in emergency setting. Patients with complicated incisional hernia were prospectively included in the study and divided into 4 groups: DR (Direct Repair) group underwent direct reconstruction of the abdominal wall, BR (Biological mesh Repair) group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with biological mesh (retro-muscular), BPR [Biological mesh and Platelet Enriched Plasma (PEP), gel] group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with Biological mesh (retro-muscular) and PEP, BPSR (biological mesh, PEP gel and Bone Marrow Stem Cells) group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with biological mesh (retromuscular), PEP and Bone Marrow Stem cells (BMSc). Forty patients were enrolled. Patients in the DR group experienced a higher rate of severe complication (p<0.05). Recurrence rates were 60% for DR patients, 20% for BM patients and 10% for the BM+PEP group (p<0.05). Median follow-up period was 64.6, 55.7 and 55.8 months (p<0.05). 7- and 30-days abdominal wall thickness is progressively increased by different techniques: BP, BP+PEP and BP+PEP+BMSc (p<0.05). No mortality was registered. Tissue engineering techniques in abdominal wall reconstruction showed promising results. They seem to reduce the recurrence rate without increasing complication one in complicated incisional abdominal wall hernia. Although many aspects are yet to be determined and standardized, it seems extremely important to continue research and experimentation in this field.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous innovations have been aided by abdominal wall surgical repair. Abdominal wall surgery was drastically altered by synthetic materials. Tissue engineering was unquestionably first applied to biomaterials. The purpose of the present study is to compare different repeating approaches with rising tissue engineering complexity in repairing complex incisional hernia in emergency setting. Patients with complicated incisional hernia were prospectively included in the study and divided into 4 groups: DR (Direct Repair) group underwent direct reconstruction of the abdominal wall, BR (Biological mesh Repair) group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with biological mesh (retro-muscular), BPR [Biological mesh and Platelet Enriched Plasma (PEP), gel] group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with Biological mesh (retro-muscular) and PEP, BPSR (biological mesh, PEP gel and Bone Marrow Stem Cells) group underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall with biological mesh (retromuscular), PEP and Bone Marrow Stem cells (BMSc). Forty patients were enrolled. Patients in the DR group experienced a higher rate of severe complication (p<0.05). Recurrence rates were 60% for DR patients, 20% for BM patients and 10% for the BM+PEP group (p<0.05). Median follow-up period was 64.6, 55.7 and 55.8 months (p<0.05). 7- and 30-days abdominal wall thickness is progressively increased by different techniques: BP, BP+PEP and BP+PEP+BMSc (p<0.05). No mortality was registered. Tissue engineering techniques in abdominal wall reconstruction showed promising results. They seem to reduce the recurrence rate without increasing complication one in complicated incisional abdominal wall hernia. Although many aspects are yet to be determined and standardized, it seems extremely important to continue research and experimentation in this field.
生物假体、富血小板血浆和骨髓干细胞在急诊外科复杂切口疝重建中的应用:一项前瞻性病例对照研究
腹壁外科修复有助于许多创新。合成材料极大地改变了腹壁手术。毫无疑问,组织工程首先应用于生物材料。本研究的目的是比较不同的重复方法和不断增加的组织工程复杂性,以在紧急情况下修复复杂的切口疝。前瞻性地将复杂性切口疝患者纳入研究,并将其分为4组:DR(直接修复)组直接重建腹壁,BR(生物网片修复)组用生物网片重建腹壁(肌后),BPR[生物网片和血小板富集血浆(PEP),凝胶]组用生物网片(肌后)和PEP重建腹壁,BPSR(生物网片、PEP凝胶和骨髓干细胞)组用生物网片(肌前)、PEP和骨髓干干细胞(BMSc)重建腹壁。40名患者入选。DR组患者严重并发症发生率较高(p<0.05)。DR患者的复发率为60%,BM患者为20%,BM+PEP组为10%(p<0.05),中位随访期分别为64.6、55.7和55.8个月(p<0.05),BP+PEP和BP+PEP+BMSc(p<0.05)。组织工程技术在腹壁重建中显示出良好的效果。它们似乎可以降低复杂切口腹壁疝的复发率,而不会增加并发症。尽管许多方面尚待确定和标准化,但继续在该领域进行研究和实验似乎极为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Care Journal
Emergency Care Journal EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
60.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信