Effect of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension on Perioperative Haemodynamic Response and Recurrent Adverse Cardiovascular Events among Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery

Q4 Medicine
Sirikarn Siripruekpong, A. Geater, S. Cheewatanakornkul
{"title":"Effect of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension on Perioperative Haemodynamic Response and Recurrent Adverse Cardiovascular Events among Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery","authors":"Sirikarn Siripruekpong, A. Geater, S. Cheewatanakornkul","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) (n=16) and adequately controlled hypertension (ACH) (n=21) patients regarding their haemodynamic response to induction, incision and extubation, and evaluate the risk of perioperative recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in a prospective observational study.  Material and Methods: After home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, patients were classified as MUCH or ACH using objective criteria. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters were monitored. Recurrent adverse event risks were evaluated using total-time and gap-time recurrent-event analysis.  Results: BP responses to induction were qualitatively similar in the two groups, but with an exaggerated response following incision and extubation in the MUCH group. Risks of recurrent hypertensive events were higher in MUCH than in ACH patients during the intraoperative and emergence periods, with hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] of 2.10 [1.21, 3.64] and 4.73 [1.12, 19.89] from total-time models, and 1.84 [1.20, 2.84] and 5.91 [1.45, 24.11] from gap-time models; the risk of recurrent bradycardia was higher during emergence, 4.08 [1.22, 13.59] from total-time and 4.88 [1.77, 13.45] from gap-time models. In contrast, the risk of recurrent hypotension was significantly lower in the MUCH patients during induction.  Conclusion: Compared to ACH, MUCH patients were at increased risk of recurrent hypertensive events during the intraoperative and emergence periods, and of recurrent bradycardia during emergence.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) (n=16) and adequately controlled hypertension (ACH) (n=21) patients regarding their haemodynamic response to induction, incision and extubation, and evaluate the risk of perioperative recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in a prospective observational study.  Material and Methods: After home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, patients were classified as MUCH or ACH using objective criteria. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters were monitored. Recurrent adverse event risks were evaluated using total-time and gap-time recurrent-event analysis.  Results: BP responses to induction were qualitatively similar in the two groups, but with an exaggerated response following incision and extubation in the MUCH group. Risks of recurrent hypertensive events were higher in MUCH than in ACH patients during the intraoperative and emergence periods, with hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] of 2.10 [1.21, 3.64] and 4.73 [1.12, 19.89] from total-time models, and 1.84 [1.20, 2.84] and 5.91 [1.45, 24.11] from gap-time models; the risk of recurrent bradycardia was higher during emergence, 4.08 [1.22, 13.59] from total-time and 4.88 [1.77, 13.45] from gap-time models. In contrast, the risk of recurrent hypotension was significantly lower in the MUCH patients during induction.  Conclusion: Compared to ACH, MUCH patients were at increased risk of recurrent hypertensive events during the intraoperative and emergence periods, and of recurrent bradycardia during emergence.
未控制的高血压对非心脏大手术患者围手术期血流动力学反应和复发不良心血管事件的影响
目的:在一项前瞻性观察性研究中,比较掩饰性未控制高血压(MUCH)(n=16)和充分控制高血压(ACH)(n=21)患者对诱导、切开和拔管的血液动力学反应,并评估围手术期复发性心血管不良事件的风险。材料和方法:在家庭血压监测后,根据客观标准将患者分为MUCH或ACH。监测围手术期血流动力学参数。使用总时间和间隔时间复发事件分析评估复发不良事件风险。结果:两组对诱导的BP反应在质量上相似,但在MUCH组中,切开和拔管后的反应有所夸大。在术中和苏醒期,MUCH患者复发性高血压事件的风险高于ACH患者,总时间模型的风险比[95%置信区间]分别为2.10[1.21,3.64]和4.73[1.12,19.89],间隙时间模型的危险比分别为1.84[1.20,2.84]和5.91[1.45,24.11];苏醒期复发性心动过缓的风险更高,总时间为4.08[1.22,13.59],间隙时间模型为4.88[1.77,13.45]。相反,MUCH患者在诱导过程中复发性低血压的风险显著降低。结论:与ACH相比,MUCH患者在术中和苏醒期再次发生高血压事件的风险增加,在苏醒期再次出现心动过缓的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信