Investigation of the U-shape submerged breakwater performance by the finite-different scheme

IF 0.7 Q4 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Mohammad Barzegar
{"title":"Investigation of the U-shape submerged breakwater performance by the finite-different scheme","authors":"Mohammad Barzegar","doi":"10.12989/OSE.2021.11.1.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The submerged U-shape breakwater interaction with the solitary wave is simulated by the Boussinesq equations using the finite-difference scheme. The wave reflection, transmission, and dissipation (RTD) coefficients are used to investigate the U-shape breakwater's performance for different crest width, Lc1, and indent breakwater height, du. The results show that the submerged breakwater performance for a set of U-shape breakwater with the same cross-section area is related to the length of submerged breakwater crest, Lc1, and the distance between the crests, Lc2 (or the height of du). The breakwater has the maximum performance when the crest length is larger, and at the same time, the distance between them increases. Changing the Lc1 and du of the U-shape breakwaters result in a significant change in the RTD coefficients. Comparison of the U-shape breakwater, having the best performance, with the averaged RTD values shows that the transmission coefficients, K_t, has a better performance of up to 4% in comparison to other breakwaters. Also, the reflection coefficients K_R and the diffusion coefficients, K_d shows a better performance of about 30% and 55% on average, respectively. However, the model governing equations are non-dissipative. The non-energy conserving of the transmission and reflection coefficients due to wave and breakwater interaction results in dissipation type contribution. The U-shape breakwater with the best performance is compared with the rectangular breakwater with the same cross-section area to investigate the economic advantages of the U-shape breakwater. The transmission coefficients, K_t, of the U-shape breakwater shows a better performance of 5% higher than the rectangular one. The reflection coefficient, K_R, is 60% lower for U-shape in comparison to rectangular one; however, the diffusion coefficients, K_d, of U-shape breakwater is 35% higher than the rectangular breakwater. Therefore, we could say that the U-shape breakwater has a better performance than the rectangular one.","PeriodicalId":44219,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Systems Engineering-An International Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Systems Engineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/OSE.2021.11.1.083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The submerged U-shape breakwater interaction with the solitary wave is simulated by the Boussinesq equations using the finite-difference scheme. The wave reflection, transmission, and dissipation (RTD) coefficients are used to investigate the U-shape breakwater's performance for different crest width, Lc1, and indent breakwater height, du. The results show that the submerged breakwater performance for a set of U-shape breakwater with the same cross-section area is related to the length of submerged breakwater crest, Lc1, and the distance between the crests, Lc2 (or the height of du). The breakwater has the maximum performance when the crest length is larger, and at the same time, the distance between them increases. Changing the Lc1 and du of the U-shape breakwaters result in a significant change in the RTD coefficients. Comparison of the U-shape breakwater, having the best performance, with the averaged RTD values shows that the transmission coefficients, K_t, has a better performance of up to 4% in comparison to other breakwaters. Also, the reflection coefficients K_R and the diffusion coefficients, K_d shows a better performance of about 30% and 55% on average, respectively. However, the model governing equations are non-dissipative. The non-energy conserving of the transmission and reflection coefficients due to wave and breakwater interaction results in dissipation type contribution. The U-shape breakwater with the best performance is compared with the rectangular breakwater with the same cross-section area to investigate the economic advantages of the U-shape breakwater. The transmission coefficients, K_t, of the U-shape breakwater shows a better performance of 5% higher than the rectangular one. The reflection coefficient, K_R, is 60% lower for U-shape in comparison to rectangular one; however, the diffusion coefficients, K_d, of U-shape breakwater is 35% higher than the rectangular breakwater. Therefore, we could say that the U-shape breakwater has a better performance than the rectangular one.
用有限差分格式研究U形水下防波堤的性能
采用有限差分格式,用Boussinesq方程模拟了u型防波堤与孤立波的相互作用。采用波浪反射、透射和耗散(RTD)系数研究了不同波峰宽度Lc1和缩进式防波堤高度du时u型防波堤的性能。结果表明:一组相同断面面积的u型防波堤的水下防波堤性能与水下防波堤波峰长度Lc1和波峰之间的距离Lc2(或高度du)有关。波峰长度越大,波峰与波峰之间的距离越长,防波堤的性能越好。改变u型防波堤的Lc1和du会导致RTD系数的显著变化。性能最好的u型防波堤与平均RTD值的比较表明,其传递系数K_t比其他防波堤的性能更好,可达4%。反射系数K_R和扩散系数K_d表现出较好的性能,平均分别达到30%和55%左右。然而,模型控制方程是非耗散的。由于波浪和防波堤相互作用导致的透射和反射系数的不节能导致耗散型贡献。将性能最佳的u型防波堤与相同断面面积的矩形防波堤进行比较,考察u型防波堤的经济优势。u型防波堤的传递系数K_t比矩形防波堤高5%。u形反射系数K_R比矩形反射系数低60%;u型防波堤的扩散系数K_d比矩形防波堤高35%。因此,我们可以说u型防波堤比矩形防波堤具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The OCEAN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING focuses on the new research and development efforts to advance the understanding of sciences and technologies in ocean systems engineering. The main subject of the journal is the multi-disciplinary engineering of ocean systems. Areas covered by the journal include; * Undersea technologies: AUVs, submersible robot, manned/unmanned submersibles, remotely operated underwater vehicle, sensors, instrumentation, measurement, and ocean observing systems; * Ocean systems technologies: ocean structures and structural systems, design and production, ocean process and plant, fatigue, fracture, reliability and risk analysis, dynamics of ocean structure system, probabilistic dynamics analysis, fluid-structure interaction, ship motion and mooring system, and port engineering; * Ocean hydrodynamics and ocean renewable energy, wave mechanics, buoyancy and stability, sloshing, slamming, and seakeeping; * Multi-physics based engineering analysis, design and testing: underwater explosions and their effects on ocean vehicle systems, equipments, and surface ships, survivability and vulnerability, shock, impact and vibration; * Modeling and simulations; * Underwater acoustics technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信