Can different polymerization times affect the surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility of flowable composite resins?

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Kazak, Safiye Selin Koymen, N. Donmez
{"title":"Can different polymerization times affect the surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility of flowable composite resins?","authors":"M. Kazak, Safiye Selin Koymen, N. Donmez","doi":"10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-66895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This in vitro study evaluated and compared the effects of different polymerization times on the surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility of flowable composite resins. Three flowable composite resins [Es Flow (ESF), IGOS Flow (IGF), Estelite Flow Quick (EFQ)] were tested in this study. Each flowable composite resin (n = 7) was polymerized in a disc-shaped mould (1x10 mm) with an LED light-curing unit (D Light Pro) for two different times (20 and 40 sec.). The top surfaces of all specimens were polished (Sof-Lex). The surface microhardnesses of the flowable composite resins were measured with a Vickers HMV microhardness tester. Water sorption and water solubility were calculated according to the ISO 4049 standard. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tamhane, Dunnett, and Tukey tests were used in the statistical analyses. Pearson’s and Spearman’s rho correlation tests were used to assess possible correlations between the different variables. The results were evaluated with a significance of p<0.05. In terms of microhardness, a significant difference was found between materials at the same polymerization times (p<0.05). All materials showed water sorption of less than 40 µg/mm3 and water solubility of less than 7.5 µg/mm3 by following ISO 4049. The correlations among surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility showed that the differences were determined by the materials and the polymerization times. The physical properties of all flowable composite resin materials were enhanced after polymerization for twice the time recommended by the manufacturers.","PeriodicalId":8951,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-66895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated and compared the effects of different polymerization times on the surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility of flowable composite resins. Three flowable composite resins [Es Flow (ESF), IGOS Flow (IGF), Estelite Flow Quick (EFQ)] were tested in this study. Each flowable composite resin (n = 7) was polymerized in a disc-shaped mould (1x10 mm) with an LED light-curing unit (D Light Pro) for two different times (20 and 40 sec.). The top surfaces of all specimens were polished (Sof-Lex). The surface microhardnesses of the flowable composite resins were measured with a Vickers HMV microhardness tester. Water sorption and water solubility were calculated according to the ISO 4049 standard. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tamhane, Dunnett, and Tukey tests were used in the statistical analyses. Pearson’s and Spearman’s rho correlation tests were used to assess possible correlations between the different variables. The results were evaluated with a significance of p<0.05. In terms of microhardness, a significant difference was found between materials at the same polymerization times (p<0.05). All materials showed water sorption of less than 40 µg/mm3 and water solubility of less than 7.5 µg/mm3 by following ISO 4049. The correlations among surface microhardness, water sorption, and water solubility showed that the differences were determined by the materials and the polymerization times. The physical properties of all flowable composite resin materials were enhanced after polymerization for twice the time recommended by the manufacturers.
不同的聚合时间会影响可流动复合树脂的表面显微硬度、吸水性和水溶性吗?
这项体外研究评估并比较了不同聚合时间对可流动复合树脂表面显微硬度、吸水性和水溶性的影响。本研究测试了三种可流动复合树脂[Es Flow(ESF)、IGOS Flow(IGF)、Estelite Flow Quick(EFQ)]。每个可流动的复合树脂(n=7)在圆盘形模具(1x10mm)中用LED光固化单元(D light Pro)聚合两个不同的时间(20和40秒)。所有样品的顶面都经过抛光(Sof-Lex)。用维氏HMV显微硬度计测定了可流动复合树脂的表面微硬度。根据ISO 4049标准计算吸水性和水溶性。统计分析中使用了单向方差分析和事后Tamhane、Dunnett和Tukey检验。Pearson和Spearman的rho相关检验用于评估不同变量之间可能的相关性。评估结果的显著性为p<0.05。在显微硬度方面,在相同聚合时间的材料之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。根据ISO 4049,所有材料的吸水性均小于40µg/mm3,水溶性均小于7.5µg/mm3。表面显微硬度、吸水性和水溶性之间的相关性表明,差异由材料和聚合时间决定。所有可流动复合树脂材料的物理性能在聚合两倍于制造商推荐的时间后得到增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioscience Journal
Bioscience Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bioscience Journal is an interdisciplinary electronic journal that publishes scientific articles in the areas of Agricultural Sciences, Biological Sciences and Health Sciences. Its mission is to disseminate new knowledge while contributing to the development of science in the country and in the world. The journal is published in a continuous flow, in English. The opinions and concepts expressed in the published articles are the sole responsibility of their authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信