Metadata standards in web archiving technological resources for ensuring the digital preservation of archived websites

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Danilo Formenton, L. S. Gracioso
{"title":"Metadata standards in web archiving technological resources for ensuring the digital preservation of archived websites","authors":"Danilo Formenton, L. S. Gracioso","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8666263/27830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Digital preservation in Web archiving will only be possible with the effective use of metadata standards. These standards are the ones that determine the persistence, consistency, comprehensibility, the access,and representation of selected sites, collected and stored in Web archives, besides defining the archivability of sites and the interoperability among systems. Objective:In this context, the objective of the article was to identify and define which metadata standards could be judged by memory institutions and universities so that they could enable digital preservation in Web archives.Methodology:For this, a qualitative, exploratory,and descriptive research was done, using the bibliographic method from a non-systematic inventory together with a review and analysis of the literature content. The Dublin Core, MODS, EAD, VRA Core, PREMIS, and METS standards were selected and analyzed. Results and Conclusion:The analysis of the results indicates that Dublin Core, MODS, EAD, and VRA Core supported METS and PREMIS in detecting and documenting technical aspects of sites and proving their authenticity, context, and origin. METS can manage archived sites by acting as OAIS information packages, while Dublin Core proved to be an exponent for Web archiving through its use in remarkable area initiatives","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8666263/27830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Digital preservation in Web archiving will only be possible with the effective use of metadata standards. These standards are the ones that determine the persistence, consistency, comprehensibility, the access,and representation of selected sites, collected and stored in Web archives, besides defining the archivability of sites and the interoperability among systems. Objective:In this context, the objective of the article was to identify and define which metadata standards could be judged by memory institutions and universities so that they could enable digital preservation in Web archives.Methodology:For this, a qualitative, exploratory,and descriptive research was done, using the bibliographic method from a non-systematic inventory together with a review and analysis of the literature content. The Dublin Core, MODS, EAD, VRA Core, PREMIS, and METS standards were selected and analyzed. Results and Conclusion:The analysis of the results indicates that Dublin Core, MODS, EAD, and VRA Core supported METS and PREMIS in detecting and documenting technical aspects of sites and proving their authenticity, context, and origin. METS can manage archived sites by acting as OAIS information packages, while Dublin Core proved to be an exponent for Web archiving through its use in remarkable area initiatives
网络存档技术资源中的元数据标准,以确保存档网站的数字化保存
引言:只有有效地使用元数据标准,网络存档中的数字保存才有可能实现。除了定义站点的可归档性和系统之间的互操作性外,这些标准还决定了所选站点的持久性、一致性、可理解性、访问和表示,这些站点被收集并存储在Web存档中。目的:在这种情况下,本文的目的是确定和定义哪些元数据标准可以被记忆机构和大学判断,以便他们能够在Web档案中实现数字保存。方法:为此,使用书目方法进行了定性、探索性和描述性研究,这些方法来自非系统清单,并对文献内容进行了回顾和分析。选择并分析了Dublin Core、MODS、EAD、VRA Core、PREMIS和METS标准。结果与结论:结果分析表明,Dublin Core、MODS、EAD和VRA Core支持METS和PREMIS检测和记录站点的技术方面,并证明其真实性、背景和来源。METS可以通过充当OAIS信息包来管理已归档的站点,而Dublin Core通过在显著的领域活动中的使用证明了它是Web归档的代表
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信