Analysis of the Russian experience in reforming control and supervisory activities (part 2)

E. V. Maslennikova, Масленникова Елена Викторовна
{"title":"Analysis of the Russian experience in reforming control and supervisory activities (part 2)","authors":"E. V. Maslennikova, Масленникова Елена Викторовна","doi":"10.22363/2312-8313-2018-5-3-318-342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern period of reform of control and Supervisory activities is full of events, novelties of norm-setting, social experiments. In recent years, the main vector of reforms is aimed at respecting the interests of controlled objects in the preparation and conduct of control and Supervisory activities, the introduction of risk-based control, allowing to concentrate resources for control and supervision in those areas where there is a high probability of violation of the values protected by law. The article considers the dynamics and the main results of the reform of control and Supervisory activities. Among the positive results of the reform are the pilot implementation of a risk-based approach in control and supervisory activities, a system for evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of control and supervisory activities. Some positive dynamics emerged in the application of checklists. From the point of view of the author, insufficient attention is paid to questions of a critical analysis of the need and sufficiency of control and supervisory activities in terms of the protection of legally protected values; the possibility of replacing state control and supervision by other, including non-state institutions. The author substantiates the conclusion about the analysis of the need for control (supervision), systematization of control and Supervisory functions and audit of mandatory requirements before making and implementing decisions related to the technological aspects of control (supervision). Also, proposals are made to adjust the provisions contained in the draft law “on state and municipal control (supervision) in the Russian Federation”.","PeriodicalId":34125,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Public Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2018-5-3-318-342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The modern period of reform of control and Supervisory activities is full of events, novelties of norm-setting, social experiments. In recent years, the main vector of reforms is aimed at respecting the interests of controlled objects in the preparation and conduct of control and Supervisory activities, the introduction of risk-based control, allowing to concentrate resources for control and supervision in those areas where there is a high probability of violation of the values protected by law. The article considers the dynamics and the main results of the reform of control and Supervisory activities. Among the positive results of the reform are the pilot implementation of a risk-based approach in control and supervisory activities, a system for evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of control and supervisory activities. Some positive dynamics emerged in the application of checklists. From the point of view of the author, insufficient attention is paid to questions of a critical analysis of the need and sufficiency of control and supervisory activities in terms of the protection of legally protected values; the possibility of replacing state control and supervision by other, including non-state institutions. The author substantiates the conclusion about the analysis of the need for control (supervision), systematization of control and Supervisory functions and audit of mandatory requirements before making and implementing decisions related to the technological aspects of control (supervision). Also, proposals are made to adjust the provisions contained in the draft law “on state and municipal control (supervision) in the Russian Federation”.
俄罗斯控制监督活动改革经验分析(下)
现代控制和监督活动改革时期充满了事件、规范制定的新颖性和社会实验。近年来,改革的主要方向是在准备和实施控制和监督活动时尊重被控制对象的利益,引入基于风险的控制,使控制和监督的资源集中在那些很可能违反法律保护的价值的领域。本文考虑了控制和监督活动改革的动力和主要成果。改革的积极成果之一是在控制和监督活动中试点实施了基于风险的方法,这是一种评估控制和监督活动有效性和效率的系统。在清单的应用中出现了一些积极的动态。从发件人的观点来看,对在保护受法律保护的价值方面对控制和监督活动的必要性和充分性进行批判性分析的问题没有给予足够的重视;用包括非国家机构在内的其他机构取代国家控制和监督的可能性。作者对控制(监督)的必要性分析、控制和监督职能的系统化以及在制定和实施与控制(监督)的技术方面有关的决策之前对强制性要求的审计进行了论证。此外,还提议调整“关于俄罗斯联邦国家和市政管制(监督)”的法律草案所载的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信