After Post-Modernity: Discussion Points Against the Background of Global Transformations

D. Evstafiev, L. A. Tsyganova
{"title":"After Post-Modernity: Discussion Points Against the Background of Global Transformations","authors":"D. Evstafiev, L. A. Tsyganova","doi":"10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-293-307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition of the basically local military-political crisis in the Western Eurasia into the real focus of global geopolitical transformations and civilizational confrontation. That has brought to the agenda the issue of degradation of the principles of universalities that were the basis for globalization in both: socio-political and socio-economic spheres thus demonstrating deepening interaction between them. The world is facing the perspective of competition of different models of development and their political and social localization that reflect the specifics of social-economic environment. The fact that global transformations became the result of interaction of the objective and subjective, contextual factors as well as sometimes were brought to reality through the interaction of political leaders brings us to the conclusion that the world is nowadays within the transitional era that contains several points of bifurcation of political nature that in turn drive for different models of socioeconomic development. The sharp nature of ongoing transformations reflects the situation when most of the paradigms and instrumental models that were regarded as axiomatically universal like institutional governance and representative democracy started to lose their relevance as political and socio-political management tools. The same is true about a bulk of global economic tools such as the universal protected nature of economic interdependence and international trade. But all that was the basis for the globalization. The system of global political and economic relations that has resided quite recently in the environment of nearly total universality started to lose synergy and integrity while forming complex localized formats in which political and socio-cultural factors play the leading role ahead of economic basis and socio-economic relationships. The research drives to the conclusion on the possibility of emergence of the two competing models claiming a global status the specifics of interaction between them and the key differences between them.","PeriodicalId":32346,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-293-307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition of the basically local military-political crisis in the Western Eurasia into the real focus of global geopolitical transformations and civilizational confrontation. That has brought to the agenda the issue of degradation of the principles of universalities that were the basis for globalization in both: socio-political and socio-economic spheres thus demonstrating deepening interaction between them. The world is facing the perspective of competition of different models of development and their political and social localization that reflect the specifics of social-economic environment. The fact that global transformations became the result of interaction of the objective and subjective, contextual factors as well as sometimes were brought to reality through the interaction of political leaders brings us to the conclusion that the world is nowadays within the transitional era that contains several points of bifurcation of political nature that in turn drive for different models of socioeconomic development. The sharp nature of ongoing transformations reflects the situation when most of the paradigms and instrumental models that were regarded as axiomatically universal like institutional governance and representative democracy started to lose their relevance as political and socio-political management tools. The same is true about a bulk of global economic tools such as the universal protected nature of economic interdependence and international trade. But all that was the basis for the globalization. The system of global political and economic relations that has resided quite recently in the environment of nearly total universality started to lose synergy and integrity while forming complex localized formats in which political and socio-cultural factors play the leading role ahead of economic basis and socio-economic relationships. The research drives to the conclusion on the possibility of emergence of the two competing models claiming a global status the specifics of interaction between them and the key differences between them.
后现代性之后:全球转型背景下的讨论要点
从欧亚大陆西部基本上局部的军事政治危机转变为全球地缘政治转型和文明对抗的真正焦点。这就把作为全球化基础的普遍性原则的退化问题提上了议程:社会政治和社会经济领域,从而表明它们之间的互动正在加深。世界正面临着不同发展模式的竞争及其政治和社会定位的视角,这反映了社会经济环境的具体情况。事实上,全球转变是客观和主观相互作用的结果,背景因素,以及有时通过政治领导人的互动而成为现实的因素,使我们得出这样的结论:当今世界正处于一个过渡时代,这个时代包含了政治性质的几个分歧点,这些分歧点反过来又推动了不同的社会经济发展模式。正在进行的变革的尖锐性质反映了这样一种情况,即大多数被视为公理般普遍的范式和工具模型,如制度治理和代议制民主,开始失去其作为政治和社会政治管理工具的相关性。许多全球经济工具也是如此,例如经济相互依存和国际贸易的普遍保护性质。但所有这些都是全球化的基础。全球政治和经济关系体系最近一直处于几乎完全普遍的环境中,它开始失去协同作用和完整性,同时形成了复杂的本地化形式,其中政治和社会文化因素在经济基础和社会经济关系之前发挥主导作用。这项研究得出了两种声称具有全球地位的竞争模式出现的可能性的结论——它们之间互动的细节以及它们之间的关键差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信