Comparative Analysis of Motor Skills Between 10–12-Year-Old Boys Volleyball Players and Physically Inactive Peers

Q4 Medicine
Rosita Kiaulakytė, Anelė Katinė
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Motor Skills Between 10–12-Year-Old Boys Volleyball Players and Physically Inactive Peers","authors":"Rosita Kiaulakytė, Anelė Katinė","doi":"10.33607/rmske.v1i28.1362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The gross motor function of team sports athletes is superior to that of peers who do not participate in additional physical activity, but it is not clear to what extent motor skills differ between boys who attend volleyball training and those who do not attend training.\nThe aim. To compare the motor skills and functional stability of the trunk of 10–12-year-old volleyball-playing and physically inactive boys.\nMethods. 30 subjects, boys aged 10–12, participated in the study. The research group consisted of boys playing volleyball (n=15), the control group – physically inactive boys (n=15). Test tools: Bruininks Oseretsky Motor Skills Profciency Test, 2nd Edition and Matthiass Functional Trunk Stability Test.\nResults. Boy volleyball players showed signifcantly better results in only three of ten evaluated motor tasks compared to inactive boys: side jumps with legs together (8.07±1.03 points vs. 7.27±0.88, p=0.026) and push-ups (5.93±1.28 points vs. 4.53±0.99, p=0.002), and V-up (4.73±1.28 points vs. 3.20±1.27, p=0.009). The result of functional stability test was better in volleyball players than in non-players (24.67±9.26 points vs. 16.53±9.34, p=0.013).\nConclusions. Boys who play volleyball had signifcantly better motor skills in strength and agility tasks compared with boys who are physically inactive. No signifcant differences were found in bilateral coordination, balance and upper extremity coordination tasks between volleyball players and physically inactive boys, but the functional stability of the trunk of boys who play volleyball was signifcantly better than that of physically inactive boys.\nKeywords: motor skills, functional trunk stability, volleyball, physically inactive","PeriodicalId":34737,"journal":{"name":"Reabilitacijos Mokslai Slauga Kineziterapija Ergoterapija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reabilitacijos Mokslai Slauga Kineziterapija Ergoterapija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33607/rmske.v1i28.1362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The gross motor function of team sports athletes is superior to that of peers who do not participate in additional physical activity, but it is not clear to what extent motor skills differ between boys who attend volleyball training and those who do not attend training. The aim. To compare the motor skills and functional stability of the trunk of 10–12-year-old volleyball-playing and physically inactive boys. Methods. 30 subjects, boys aged 10–12, participated in the study. The research group consisted of boys playing volleyball (n=15), the control group – physically inactive boys (n=15). Test tools: Bruininks Oseretsky Motor Skills Profciency Test, 2nd Edition and Matthiass Functional Trunk Stability Test. Results. Boy volleyball players showed signifcantly better results in only three of ten evaluated motor tasks compared to inactive boys: side jumps with legs together (8.07±1.03 points vs. 7.27±0.88, p=0.026) and push-ups (5.93±1.28 points vs. 4.53±0.99, p=0.002), and V-up (4.73±1.28 points vs. 3.20±1.27, p=0.009). The result of functional stability test was better in volleyball players than in non-players (24.67±9.26 points vs. 16.53±9.34, p=0.013). Conclusions. Boys who play volleyball had signifcantly better motor skills in strength and agility tasks compared with boys who are physically inactive. No signifcant differences were found in bilateral coordination, balance and upper extremity coordination tasks between volleyball players and physically inactive boys, but the functional stability of the trunk of boys who play volleyball was signifcantly better than that of physically inactive boys. Keywords: motor skills, functional trunk stability, volleyball, physically inactive
10-12岁男孩排球运动员与身体不活跃的同龄人运动技能的比较分析
背景团队运动运动员的总运动功能优于不参加额外体育活动的同龄人,但尚不清楚参加排球训练的男孩和不参加训练的男孩的运动技能差异有多大。目标。比较10-12岁排球运动员和身体不活跃男孩躯干的运动技能和功能稳定性。方法。30名受试者,10-12岁的男孩,参与了这项研究。研究组由打排球的男孩(n=15)组成,对照组为身体不活跃的男孩(n=15)。测试工具:Bruininks-Oseretsky运动技能熟练度测试,第二版和Matthias躯干功能稳定性测试。结果。与不活跃的男孩相比,男孩排球运动员在十项评估的运动任务中只有三项表现出明显更好的结果:双腿并拢的侧跳(8.07±1.03分对7.27±0.88分,p=0.026)和俯卧撑(5.93±1.28分对4.53±0.99分,p=0.002),和V-up(4.73±1.28分对3.20±1.27分,p=0.009)。排球运动员的功能稳定性测试结果优于非排球运动员(24.67±9.26分对16.53±9.34分,p=0.013)。排球运动员与身体不活跃的男孩在双侧协调、平衡和上肢协调任务方面没有发现显著差异,但打排球的男孩躯干的功能稳定性明显好于身体不活跃男孩。关键词:运动技能、躯干功能稳定性、排球、身体不活动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信