{"title":"Acceptance of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination by Healthcare Workers in Primary Health Care Workers Centers- Riyadh, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Muharib Alrashdi, A. AbdAlrouf, Mostafa Kofi","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Seasonal influenza disturbs work fluency and jeopardizes patients’ safety. Influenza vaccination uptake among Healthcare Workers (HCWs) is suboptimal all over the globe. This study aimed to study the influenza vaccination acceptance and uptake among HCWs in Wazarat Health Care Center (WHC) at Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method: Two hundred out of randomly selected 240 HCWs working at WHC-PSMMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were surveyed between May and June 2017. A validated 25-items self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data included sociodemographic, work and health related data, and beliefs towards influenza and its vaccine. Scoring system was used for transformed categorical data. The mean scores, median and Interquartile (IQR) were estimated and compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to study the associations of the influenza vaccine uptake with those covariates. IBM® SPSS®16 Statistics software was used for data analysis. Ethical aspects including confidentiality, informed consent, and approval were carefully considered. Results: With a response rate of 83% to the survey, only 41% of the participants found have received the 2016 influenza vaccine. On univariate analysis gender, nationality, occupation, level of education, work nature, work experience, past infection, and previous vaccination were associated with vaccination uptake. The vaccinated HCWs were more likely to perceive themself susceptible to influenza and its complications and to perceive the influenza vaccine as safe and effective compared to unvaccinated HCWs. On Multivariate analysis, HCWs perceived influenza vaccine as beneficial, HCWs doing clinical works and non-Saudi HCWs were (Odd Ratio (OR):1.25 (95% Confidence Interval (CI); 1.10, 1.42) P=0.001), (OR: 2.83 (95% CI; 1.10, 7.28) P=0.03), and (OR: 3.81(95% CI; 1.24, 11.67) P=0.03) times more likely to vaccinate against influenza, respectively. Conclusion: Despite rigorous recommendation influenza vaccination uptake was suboptimal. Mandatory influenza vaccination policy may need to be adopted to achieve a vaccination coverage above 80% as recommended by the world health organization (WHO). This could be combined with interventions that address the associated factors to guarantee the maintenance of the desirable acceptance level and minimize the declination rate. Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access Alrashdi M, et al. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 187. www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100087 www.gavinpublishers.com","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza disturbs work fluency and jeopardizes patients’ safety. Influenza vaccination uptake among Healthcare Workers (HCWs) is suboptimal all over the globe. This study aimed to study the influenza vaccination acceptance and uptake among HCWs in Wazarat Health Care Center (WHC) at Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method: Two hundred out of randomly selected 240 HCWs working at WHC-PSMMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were surveyed between May and June 2017. A validated 25-items self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data included sociodemographic, work and health related data, and beliefs towards influenza and its vaccine. Scoring system was used for transformed categorical data. The mean scores, median and Interquartile (IQR) were estimated and compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to study the associations of the influenza vaccine uptake with those covariates. IBM® SPSS®16 Statistics software was used for data analysis. Ethical aspects including confidentiality, informed consent, and approval were carefully considered. Results: With a response rate of 83% to the survey, only 41% of the participants found have received the 2016 influenza vaccine. On univariate analysis gender, nationality, occupation, level of education, work nature, work experience, past infection, and previous vaccination were associated with vaccination uptake. The vaccinated HCWs were more likely to perceive themself susceptible to influenza and its complications and to perceive the influenza vaccine as safe and effective compared to unvaccinated HCWs. On Multivariate analysis, HCWs perceived influenza vaccine as beneficial, HCWs doing clinical works and non-Saudi HCWs were (Odd Ratio (OR):1.25 (95% Confidence Interval (CI); 1.10, 1.42) P=0.001), (OR: 2.83 (95% CI; 1.10, 7.28) P=0.03), and (OR: 3.81(95% CI; 1.24, 11.67) P=0.03) times more likely to vaccinate against influenza, respectively. Conclusion: Despite rigorous recommendation influenza vaccination uptake was suboptimal. Mandatory influenza vaccination policy may need to be adopted to achieve a vaccination coverage above 80% as recommended by the world health organization (WHO). This could be combined with interventions that address the associated factors to guarantee the maintenance of the desirable acceptance level and minimize the declination rate. Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access Alrashdi M, et al. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 187. www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100087 www.gavinpublishers.com
背景:季节性流感扰乱了工作的流畅性,危及患者的安全。在全球范围内,医护人员接种流感疫苗的情况并不理想。本研究旨在研究沙特阿拉伯利雅得苏丹王子军事医疗城瓦扎拉特卫生保健中心(WHC)HCW对流感疫苗接种的接受和接受情况。方法:在2017年5月至6月期间,从随机选择的240名在沙特阿拉伯利雅得WHC-PSMMC工作的HCW中抽取200人进行调查。使用经验证的25项自我管理问卷来收集数据。收集的数据包括社会人口统计、工作和健康相关数据,以及对流感及其疫苗的看法。评分系统用于转换的分类数据。对平均得分、中位数和四分位数(IQR)进行估计和比较。使用单变量和多变量分析来研究流感疫苗摄入与这些协变量的相关性。使用IBM®SPSS®16统计软件进行数据分析。包括保密、知情同意和批准在内的伦理方面都经过了仔细考虑。结果:调查的应答率为83%,只有41%的参与者接种了2016年流感疫苗。在单因素分析中,性别、国籍、职业、教育水平、工作性质、工作经历、既往感染和既往接种疫苗与疫苗接种率相关。与未接种疫苗的医务人员相比,接种疫苗的医护人员更有可能认为自己对流感及其并发症敏感,并认为流感疫苗安全有效。在多变量分析中,医务人员认为流感疫苗是有益的,从事临床工作的医务人员和非沙特医务人员的比值比(OR)为1.25(95%置信区间(CI);1.10,1.42)P=0.001)、(OR:2.83(95%CI;1.10,7.28)P=0.03)和(OR:3.81(95%CI:1.24,11.67)P=0.03。结论:尽管有严格的建议,但流感疫苗接种率并不理想。根据世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)的建议,可能需要采取强制性流感疫苗接种政策,以实现80%以上的疫苗接种覆盖率。这可以与解决相关因素的干预措施相结合,以确保维持理想的验收水平并将下降率降至最低。家庭医学和初级保健:开放获取Alrashdi M,et al.J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6:187。www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100087 www.gavinpublishers.com