Narrative coherence in Digenes Akrites (G)

IF 0.3 4区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI:10.1017/byz.2021.14

M. Kulhánková

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that coherence in medieval narratives was perceived differently than it is in modern literature, offering an analysis of coherence principles in Digenes Akrites which seem to have been more relevant for its original audiences. Drawing on contemporary narratology and recent research on comparable western works, the author does not search for one sole superordinate principle, but rather for so-called structures of mid-range coherence. The article contains some examples of such ‘centres of gravity’ – the schema, the scene and the meaning – in the G version.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Digenes Akrites的叙事连贯性（G）

本文认为，人们对中世纪叙事中的连贯性的看法与现代文学中的连贯性有所不同，并对《狄根尼斯·阿克里特》中的连贯性原则进行了分析，这些原则似乎与原著读者更相关。作者借鉴了当代叙事学和最近对西方同类作品的研究，并没有寻找一个唯一的最高原则，而是寻找所谓的中程连贯结构。这篇文章在G版本中包含了一些这样的“重心”的例子——图式、场景和意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies is an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published twice a year in spring and autumn, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of Byzantine and Modern Greek scholarship, whether historical, literary or social-anthropological. It welcomes research, criticism, contributions on theory and method in the form of articles, critical studies and short notes.