Bacillus coagulans as an alternative to antibiotics in the performance and control of Salmonella Enteritidis in broilers

Q4 Veterinary
D. I. O. Lacerda, M. P. Maciel, W. Araujo, Felipe Shindy Aiura, Deyvison da Silva Gonçalves, H. F. D. Brito
{"title":"Bacillus coagulans as an alternative to antibiotics in the performance and control of Salmonella Enteritidis in broilers","authors":"D. I. O. Lacerda, M. P. Maciel, W. Araujo, Felipe Shindy Aiura, Deyvison da Silva Gonçalves, H. F. D. Brito","doi":"10.5965/223811712132022290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feed has been beneficial for improving performance and preventing diseases. However, the indiscriminate use of these products in the feed can result in the development of resistant bacteria, the accumulation of residues in the products, and an imbalance in the microflora of birds. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate alternatives, such as beneficial microorganisms that improve microbial growth without affecting animal health and product quality. This research aimed to evaluate the supplementation with the probiotic Bacillus coagulans on the performance, carcass characteristics, and health of broilers from seven to 42 days. In total, 720 broilers were used, distributed in a randomized block design with six treatments and eight replicates. The evaluated treatments were as follows: Control ration (RC); PROB1 (Probiotic 400 g/t); PROB2 (Probiotic 400 g/t until 21 days and 200 g/t from 22 to 42 days); RC + antibiotic; RC + Salmonella inoculation; PROB1 + Salmonella inoculation. The treatments did neither influence feed intake, carcass yield, and cuts nor the incidence of injuries to the chest, hock, and footpad. Weight gain and feed conversion were better in birds that received antibiotic or probiotic diets. There was an incidence of Salmonella in the e challenges excreta at 42 days only in the treatment with challenge without adding probiotics. We conclude that the probiotic Bacillus coagulans can be used as an alternative to antibiotics in the diet of broilers as it facilitates similar performance and is efficient in the control of Salmonella Enteritidis.","PeriodicalId":37575,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712132022290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feed has been beneficial for improving performance and preventing diseases. However, the indiscriminate use of these products in the feed can result in the development of resistant bacteria, the accumulation of residues in the products, and an imbalance in the microflora of birds. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate alternatives, such as beneficial microorganisms that improve microbial growth without affecting animal health and product quality. This research aimed to evaluate the supplementation with the probiotic Bacillus coagulans on the performance, carcass characteristics, and health of broilers from seven to 42 days. In total, 720 broilers were used, distributed in a randomized block design with six treatments and eight replicates. The evaluated treatments were as follows: Control ration (RC); PROB1 (Probiotic 400 g/t); PROB2 (Probiotic 400 g/t until 21 days and 200 g/t from 22 to 42 days); RC + antibiotic; RC + Salmonella inoculation; PROB1 + Salmonella inoculation. The treatments did neither influence feed intake, carcass yield, and cuts nor the incidence of injuries to the chest, hock, and footpad. Weight gain and feed conversion were better in birds that received antibiotic or probiotic diets. There was an incidence of Salmonella in the e challenges excreta at 42 days only in the treatment with challenge without adding probiotics. We conclude that the probiotic Bacillus coagulans can be used as an alternative to antibiotics in the diet of broilers as it facilitates similar performance and is efficient in the control of Salmonella Enteritidis.
凝固芽孢杆菌作为抗生素替代品在肉鸡肠炎沙门氏菌生产性能和控制中的应用
在肉鸡饲料中使用抗菌生长促进剂有利于提高生产性能和预防疾病。然而,在饲料中不分青红皂白地使用这些产品会导致抗性细菌的产生、产品中残留物的积累以及鸟类微生物群落的失衡。因此,有必要评估替代品,例如在不影响动物健康和产品质量的情况下改善微生物生长的有益微生物。本研究旨在评估添加益生菌凝结芽孢杆菌对肉鸡生产性能、胴体特性和健康的影响。总共使用了720只肉鸡,采用随机分组设计,共有6个处理和8个重复。评价处理如下:对照日粮(RC);PROB1(益生菌400 g/t);PROB2(益生菌400 g/t至21天,200 g/t至22至42天);RC+抗生素;RC+沙门氏菌接种;PROB1+沙门氏菌接种。这些处理既不影响采食量、胴体产量和切口,也不影响胸部、飞节和脚垫受伤的发生率。接受抗生素或益生菌饮食的鸟类体重增加和饲料转化率更好。只有在未添加益生菌的激发处理中,才在第42天的激发排泄物中出现沙门氏菌的发病率。我们得出的结论是,益生菌凝结芽孢杆菌可作为肉鸡日粮中抗生素的替代品,因为它有助于提高肉鸡的类似性能,并能有效控制肠炎沙门氏菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias
Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences) (ISSN 2238-1171) focus on publishing original and unpublished tecnical-scientific works regarding on researches in Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences and related areas. The objective of this journal is to publish double-blind peer reviewed research articles, research notes, and review articles contributing significantly for scientific knowledge diffusion and socialization, being made available to libraries of education and research institutions performing scientific activities on plants, animals, and related organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信