Instantaneous Brain Strain Estimation for Automotive Head Impacts via Deep Learning.

Q2 Medicine
Shaoju Wu, Wei Zhao, S. Barbat, J. Ruan, Songbai Ji
{"title":"Instantaneous Brain Strain Estimation for Automotive Head Impacts via Deep Learning.","authors":"Shaoju Wu, Wei Zhao, S. Barbat, J. Ruan, Songbai Ji","doi":"10.4271/2021-22-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficient brain strain estimation is critical for routine application of a head injury model. Lately, a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been successfully developed to estimate spatially detailed brain strains instantly and accurately in contact sports. Here, we extend its application to automotive head impacts, where impact profiles are typically more complex with longer durations. Head impact kinematics (N=458) from two public databases were used to generate augmented impacts (N=2694). They were simulated using the anisotropic Worcester Head Injury Model (WHIM) V1.0, which provided baseline elementwise peak maximum principal strain (MPS). For each augmented impact, rotational velocity (vrot) and the corresponding rotational acceleration (arot) profiles were concatenated as static images to serve as CNN input. Three training strategies were evaluated: 1) \"baseline\", using random initial weights; 2) \"transfer learning\", using weight transfer from a previous CNN model trained on head impacts drawn from contact sports; and 3) \"combined training\", combining previous training data from contact sports (N=5661) for training. The combined training achieved the best performances. For peak MPS, the CNN achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.932 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.031 for the real-world testing dataset. It also achieved a success rate of 60.5% and 94.8% for elementwise MPS, where the linear regression slope, k, and correlation coefficient, r, between estimated and simulated MPS did not deviate from 1.0 (when identical) by more than 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. Cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) from the CNN estimation was also highly accurate compared to those from direct simulation across a range of thresholds (R2 of 0.899-0.943 with RMSE of 0.054-0.069). Finally, the CNN achieved an average k and r of 0.98±0.12 and 0.90±0.07, respectively, for six reconstructed car crash impacts drawn from two other sources independent of the training dataset. Importantly, the CNN is able to efficiently estimate elementwise MPS with sufficient accuracy while conventional kinematic injury metrics cannot. Therefore, the CNN has the potential to supersede current kinematic injury metrics that can only approximate a global peak MPS or CSDM. The CNN technique developed here may offer enhanced utility in the design and development of head protective countermeasures, including in the automotive industry. This is the first study aimed at instantly estimating spatially detailed brain strains for automotive head impacts, which employs >8.8 thousand impact simulations generated from ~1.5 years of nonstop computations on a high-performance computing platform.","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"139-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-22-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Efficient brain strain estimation is critical for routine application of a head injury model. Lately, a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been successfully developed to estimate spatially detailed brain strains instantly and accurately in contact sports. Here, we extend its application to automotive head impacts, where impact profiles are typically more complex with longer durations. Head impact kinematics (N=458) from two public databases were used to generate augmented impacts (N=2694). They were simulated using the anisotropic Worcester Head Injury Model (WHIM) V1.0, which provided baseline elementwise peak maximum principal strain (MPS). For each augmented impact, rotational velocity (vrot) and the corresponding rotational acceleration (arot) profiles were concatenated as static images to serve as CNN input. Three training strategies were evaluated: 1) "baseline", using random initial weights; 2) "transfer learning", using weight transfer from a previous CNN model trained on head impacts drawn from contact sports; and 3) "combined training", combining previous training data from contact sports (N=5661) for training. The combined training achieved the best performances. For peak MPS, the CNN achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.932 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.031 for the real-world testing dataset. It also achieved a success rate of 60.5% and 94.8% for elementwise MPS, where the linear regression slope, k, and correlation coefficient, r, between estimated and simulated MPS did not deviate from 1.0 (when identical) by more than 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. Cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) from the CNN estimation was also highly accurate compared to those from direct simulation across a range of thresholds (R2 of 0.899-0.943 with RMSE of 0.054-0.069). Finally, the CNN achieved an average k and r of 0.98±0.12 and 0.90±0.07, respectively, for six reconstructed car crash impacts drawn from two other sources independent of the training dataset. Importantly, the CNN is able to efficiently estimate elementwise MPS with sufficient accuracy while conventional kinematic injury metrics cannot. Therefore, the CNN has the potential to supersede current kinematic injury metrics that can only approximate a global peak MPS or CSDM. The CNN technique developed here may offer enhanced utility in the design and development of head protective countermeasures, including in the automotive industry. This is the first study aimed at instantly estimating spatially detailed brain strains for automotive head impacts, which employs >8.8 thousand impact simulations generated from ~1.5 years of nonstop computations on a high-performance computing platform.
基于深度学习的汽车头部撞击瞬时脑损伤估计。
有效的大脑应变估计对于头部损伤模型的常规应用至关重要。最近,一种卷积神经网络(CNN)被成功开发出来,可以在接触式运动中即时准确地估计空间细节的大脑应变。在这里,我们将其应用扩展到汽车头部碰撞,其中碰撞轮廓通常更复杂,持续时间更长。使用来自两个公共数据库的头部撞击运动学(N=458)来生成增强撞击(N=2694)。使用各向异性Worcester头部损伤模型(WHIM)V1.0对其进行模拟,该模型提供了基线元素峰值最大主应变(MPS)。对于每个增强的撞击,旋转速度(vrot)和相应的旋转加速度(arot)轮廓被连接为静态图像,用作CNN输入。评估了三种训练策略:1)“基线”,使用随机初始权重;2) “迁移学习”,使用来自先前CNN模型的重量迁移,该模型针对接触式运动中的头部撞击进行训练;和3)“组合训练”,结合以前接触性运动的训练数据(N=5661)进行训练。联合训练取得了最好的成绩。对于峰值MPS,对于真实世界的测试数据集,CNN实现了0.932的确定系数(R2)和0.031的均方根误差(RMSE)。元素MPS的成功率分别为60.5%和94.8%,其中估计和模拟MPS之间的线性回归斜率k和相关系数r与1.0(当相同时)的偏差分别不超过0.1和0.2。在一系列阈值范围内(R2为0.899-0.943,RMSE为0.054-0.069),与直接模拟相比,CNN估计的累积应变损伤测量(CSDM)也非常准确。最后,CNN获得的平均k和r分别为0.98±0.12和0.90±0.07,对于从独立于训练数据集的另外两个来源提取的六个重建的车祸碰撞。重要的是,CNN能够以足够的精度有效地估计元素MPS,而传统的运动损伤指标则不能。因此,CNN有可能取代目前只能近似于全球峰值MPS或CSDM的运动损伤指标。这里开发的CNN技术可以在头部保护对策的设计和开发中提供更高的实用性,包括在汽车行业中。这是第一项旨在即时估计汽车头部碰撞的空间细节大脑应变的研究,该研究采用了在高性能计算平台上经过约1.5年的不间断计算产生的880 000多个碰撞模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信