Wouter Van Dooren, Morten Hjortskov, Steven F. De Vadder, K. Verhoest
求助PDF
{"title":"The Consistency of Question‐order Bias in a Changing Political Context Six Large‐scale Surveys on Trust and Perceptions of Pandemic Governance Effectiveness","authors":"Wouter Van Dooren, Morten Hjortskov, Steven F. De Vadder, K. Verhoest","doi":"10.1111/padm.12919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question-order bias is a well-known weakness of surveys commonly used in public administration research. However, most research on question-order bias uses question-order experiments that are relatively small, performed in one context, and rarely replicated. We carry out six question-order experiments in six large-scale Belgian surveys conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. All experiments vary whether the respondents see questions regarding the effectiveness of pandemic governance or trust in different actors first. Results show that question-order effects are real and reasonably consistent across the high-powered replications, despite the changing political context of the pandemic. However, the direction of the effects largely changes when we flip the order of the trust outcome questions in the last three experiments, which sheds light on an underappreciated point: question-order bias also seems to exist within batteries of seemingly similar outcome questions. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.","PeriodicalId":48284,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
不断变化的政治背景下问题顺序偏见的一致性——关于流行病治理有效性的信任和认知的六项大规模调查
问题顺序偏见是公共行政研究中常用的调查的一个众所周知的弱点。然而,大多数关于问题顺序偏差的研究都使用相对较小的问题顺序实验,在一个上下文中进行,很少重复。我们在新冠肺炎大流行期间进行的六次比利时大规模调查中进行了六次问答实验。无论受访者首先看到的是有关疫情治理有效性的问题,还是对不同行为者的信任,所有实验都各不相同。结果表明,尽管疫情的政治背景不断变化,但问题顺序效应在高功率复制中是真实且合理一致的。然而,在最后三个实验中,当我们改变信任结果问题的顺序时,影响的方向会发生很大变化,这揭示了一个未被充分重视的点:问题顺序偏差似乎也存在于看似相似的结果问题中。©2023 John Wiley&Sons有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。