Bleak signs of our times: Descent into ‘Terminal Marketing’

IF 3.4 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Oscar Ahlberg, Jack Coffin, J. Hietanen
{"title":"Bleak signs of our times: Descent into ‘Terminal Marketing’","authors":"Oscar Ahlberg, Jack Coffin, J. Hietanen","doi":"10.1177/14705931221095604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketing theory has twisted and turned with the introduction of many theoretical innovations. Yet, despite being influenced by various critical perspectives, the general marketing discourse remains remarkably optimistic about contemporary consumer culture, its capability to produce meaning and individuality, and its potential to overcome the existential threats of the 21st century, or at least its capacity to be transformed for the better. This paper discerns a countervailing current within critical marketing thought; a smattering of scholars that resist the therapeutic urge to tell that all will be well, producing a proliferation of papers that are deeply pessimistic about conventional marketing concepts like meaningful experience, agency, and the sovereignty of the consumer ‘self’. Against the current of convention, this research seeks to address an increasing zeitgeist of bleak cultural aporia, an atmosphere of apolitical apathy where the future has increasingly been ‘cancelled’ and all that remains is a carnivalesque consumer culture that has resigned itself to extinction, even if on the semiotic surface it is increasingly ethical and ecological. The present paper catalogues this development and draws together some of its tendencies. Chief amongst these is the tendency to see the consumer as a desiring intensity immersed in vast networks of techno-capitalism and thus reduces the idea of the agentic and individualistically creative consumer into a myth at best. We propose the term Terminal Marketing to describe this pessimistic theoretical attitude, but we consider its mood as potentially producing more critical interventions than the generally critical-yet-optimistic tone of interpretive marketing.","PeriodicalId":48020,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"667 - 688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221095604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Marketing theory has twisted and turned with the introduction of many theoretical innovations. Yet, despite being influenced by various critical perspectives, the general marketing discourse remains remarkably optimistic about contemporary consumer culture, its capability to produce meaning and individuality, and its potential to overcome the existential threats of the 21st century, or at least its capacity to be transformed for the better. This paper discerns a countervailing current within critical marketing thought; a smattering of scholars that resist the therapeutic urge to tell that all will be well, producing a proliferation of papers that are deeply pessimistic about conventional marketing concepts like meaningful experience, agency, and the sovereignty of the consumer ‘self’. Against the current of convention, this research seeks to address an increasing zeitgeist of bleak cultural aporia, an atmosphere of apolitical apathy where the future has increasingly been ‘cancelled’ and all that remains is a carnivalesque consumer culture that has resigned itself to extinction, even if on the semiotic surface it is increasingly ethical and ecological. The present paper catalogues this development and draws together some of its tendencies. Chief amongst these is the tendency to see the consumer as a desiring intensity immersed in vast networks of techno-capitalism and thus reduces the idea of the agentic and individualistically creative consumer into a myth at best. We propose the term Terminal Marketing to describe this pessimistic theoretical attitude, but we consider its mood as potentially producing more critical interventions than the generally critical-yet-optimistic tone of interpretive marketing.
我们这个时代的惨淡迹象:陷入“终端营销”
随着许多理论创新的引入,市场营销理论发生了扭曲和转变。然而,尽管受到各种批评观点的影响,一般的营销话语仍然对当代消费文化,其产生意义和个性的能力,以及克服21世纪存在主义威胁的潜力,或者至少是它向更好的方向转变的能力持非常乐观的态度。本文在批判性营销思想中发现了一种逆流;少数学者抵制治疗性的冲动,说一切都会好起来,产生了大量的论文,对传统的营销概念,如有意义的体验,代理和消费者“自我”的主权深感悲观。与传统的潮流相反,这项研究试图解决日益增长的黯淡文化恐慌的时代精神,一种对未来越来越“取消”的无政治冷漠的氛围,剩下的只是一种狂欢式的消费文化,这种消费文化已经消亡,即使在符号学表面上它越来越合乎伦理和生态。本文对这一发展进行了分类,并总结了其中的一些趋势。其中最主要的是将消费者视为沉浸在庞大的技术资本主义网络中的欲望强度的倾向,从而将代理和个人主义创造性消费者的想法最多减少为神话。我们提出“终端营销”一词来描述这种悲观的理论态度,但我们认为其情绪可能比解释性营销的普遍批评但乐观的基调产生更多的批判性干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marketing Theory
Marketing Theory BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Marketing Theory provides a fully peer reviewed specialised academic medium and main reference for the development and dissemination of alternative and critical perspectives on marketing theory. A growing number of researchers and management practitioners who believe that conventional marketing theory is often ill suited to the challenges of the modern business environment. The aim of Marketing Theory is to create a high quality, specialist outlet for management and social scientists who are committed to developing and reformulating marketing as an academic discipline by critically analysing existing theory. The journal promotes an ethos that is explicitly theory driven; international in scope and vision; open, reflexive, imaginative and critical; and interdisciplinary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信