Are Inflammatory Markers Useful in Predicting Urinary Tract Infection After Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate?

N. A. Heidar, M. Shahait, A. Yaacoubian, R. Nasr
{"title":"Are Inflammatory Markers Useful in Predicting Urinary Tract Infection After Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate?","authors":"N. A. Heidar, M. Shahait, A. Yaacoubian, R. Nasr","doi":"10.14740/wjnu398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sepsis is a serious and life-threatening complication after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. It is critical to predict its occurrence prior to conducting the biopsy. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) have been proven to be promising diagnostic indicators of infectious complications after various surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to determine whether inflammatory markers, NLR and PLR ratios, are useful surrogates to predict sepsis after TRUS biopsy. Methods: A total of 378 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy with no clinical evidence of prostatitis from December 2009 to May 2013 in American University of Beirut Medical Center. Data collected included age, smoking status, prostate size, post-void residual, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, blood culture, urine culture, Gleason score, pathology results, neutrophils, leukocyte count and platelet counts. Also, NLR and PLR were calculated. The primary outcome collected was sepsis. All data were entered and analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Of the 378 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy, 31 patients developed sepsis. Septic patients were younger (63.7 ± 6.2 years) than non-septic patients (65.5 ± 8.0 years). No association between sepsis and NLR or PLR was observed; however, a significant association between sepsis and pre-biopsy urine analysis and pre-biopsy PSA (P = 0.011) was noted. Conclusion: In this study, none of the pre-procedure NLR and PLR studied was found to predict sepsis after TRUS biopsy. Future efforts should be directed to investigate this relationship in prospective studies. World J Nephrol Urol. 2020;9(1):11-14 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu398","PeriodicalId":91634,"journal":{"name":"World journal of nephrology and urology","volume":"9 1","pages":"11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a serious and life-threatening complication after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. It is critical to predict its occurrence prior to conducting the biopsy. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) have been proven to be promising diagnostic indicators of infectious complications after various surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to determine whether inflammatory markers, NLR and PLR ratios, are useful surrogates to predict sepsis after TRUS biopsy. Methods: A total of 378 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy with no clinical evidence of prostatitis from December 2009 to May 2013 in American University of Beirut Medical Center. Data collected included age, smoking status, prostate size, post-void residual, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, blood culture, urine culture, Gleason score, pathology results, neutrophils, leukocyte count and platelet counts. Also, NLR and PLR were calculated. The primary outcome collected was sepsis. All data were entered and analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Of the 378 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy, 31 patients developed sepsis. Septic patients were younger (63.7 ± 6.2 years) than non-septic patients (65.5 ± 8.0 years). No association between sepsis and NLR or PLR was observed; however, a significant association between sepsis and pre-biopsy urine analysis and pre-biopsy PSA (P = 0.011) was noted. Conclusion: In this study, none of the pre-procedure NLR and PLR studied was found to predict sepsis after TRUS biopsy. Future efforts should be directed to investigate this relationship in prospective studies. World J Nephrol Urol. 2020;9(1):11-14 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu398
炎症标志物在经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后预测尿路感染有用吗?
背景:脓毒症是经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下前列腺活检后严重且危及生命的并发症。在进行活检之前预测其发生是至关重要的。中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞比率(PLR)已被证明是各种外科手术后感染性并发症的有希望的诊断指标。本研究的目的是确定炎症标志物NLR和PLR比率是否可以作为预测TRUS活检后脓毒症的有用替代指标。方法:2009年12月至2013年5月在贝鲁特美国大学医学中心接受前列腺活检的378例无前列腺炎临床证据的患者。收集的数据包括年龄、吸烟状况、前列腺大小、空后残留、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值、血培养、尿培养、Gleason评分、病理结果、中性粒细胞、白细胞计数和血小板计数。同时计算NLR和PLR。收集的主要结局是败血症。所有数据均通过社会科学统计软件包进行输入和分析。结果:378例接受TRUS活检的患者中,31例发生败血症。脓毒症患者(63.7±6.2岁)比非脓毒症患者(65.5±8.0岁)年轻。脓毒症与NLR或PLR无关联;然而,脓毒症与活检前尿液分析和活检前PSA之间存在显著关联(P = 0.011)。结论:在本研究中,未发现术前NLR和PLR可以预测TRUS活检后的脓毒症。未来的努力应该是在前瞻性研究中调查这种关系。世界给水排水学报,2020;9(1):11-14 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu398
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信