Relative mechanical load on back and hip muscles in standing position when handling materials manually. A study of packing work.

O. Svensson, G. Németh, J. Ekholm
{"title":"Relative mechanical load on back and hip muscles in standing position when handling materials manually. A study of packing work.","authors":"O. Svensson, G. Németh, J. Ekholm","doi":"10.2340/165019778719159168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muscular load on the back and hip muscles was quantified and compared using a muscular strength utilization ratio (MUR). The MUR was obtained by dividing the total moment about the bilateral joint axis by the counteracting maximum muscular strength at the same joint angle. 72 different postures during simulated packing work were studied, with different combinations of box size, angle, edge height and weight. The MUR was calculated for a large, an average sized and a small man depending on whether they were all either strong, of average strength, or weak, thus giving nine MUR values for each posture. For a weak man, the MUR exceeded 100% in many postures. The largest box at a zero- or 30-degree angle to the horizontal with its upper edge 20 cm below elbow height gave the highest MUR, while the smallest box angled at 90 degrees with the upper edge 10 cm above elbow height gave the lowest. The presented concept of relating joint load to strength is proposed for use in preventive ergonomic counselling and in vocational rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":76523,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","volume":"19 4 1","pages":"159-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/165019778719159168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Muscular load on the back and hip muscles was quantified and compared using a muscular strength utilization ratio (MUR). The MUR was obtained by dividing the total moment about the bilateral joint axis by the counteracting maximum muscular strength at the same joint angle. 72 different postures during simulated packing work were studied, with different combinations of box size, angle, edge height and weight. The MUR was calculated for a large, an average sized and a small man depending on whether they were all either strong, of average strength, or weak, thus giving nine MUR values for each posture. For a weak man, the MUR exceeded 100% in many postures. The largest box at a zero- or 30-degree angle to the horizontal with its upper edge 20 cm below elbow height gave the highest MUR, while the smallest box angled at 90 degrees with the upper edge 10 cm above elbow height gave the lowest. The presented concept of relating joint load to strength is proposed for use in preventive ergonomic counselling and in vocational rehabilitation.
手动搬运物料时,站立时背部和臀部肌肉的相对机械负荷。包装工作的研究
背部和臀部肌肉上的肌肉负荷被量化,并使用肌肉力量利用率(MUR)进行比较。MUR是通过将绕双侧关节轴的总力矩除以相同关节角度下的最大肌肉力量来获得的。在模拟包装工作中,研究了72种不同的姿势,包括盒子大小、角度、边缘高度和重量的不同组合。根据体型较大、体型中等和体型较小的人是强壮、力量中等还是虚弱来计算他们的MUR,从而为每个姿势提供九个MUR值。对于一个虚弱的男人来说,MUR在许多姿势中都超过了100%。与水平面成0度或30度角的最大盒子,其上边缘低于肘部高度20厘米,给出的MUR最高,而成90度角的最小盒子,上边缘高于肘部高度10厘米,给出最低。提出了将关节负荷与力量联系起来的概念,用于预防性人体工程学咨询和职业康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信