Simple models for neuroscience research discoveries: how often are these models used in Africa?

S. K. Hamidu, Ahmad Umar, R. Abdulazeez, Zaid Muhammad, A. I. Alkhamis, M. Umar, Ahmad Aliyu Ladan, F. Nasr, Aisha Ahmad, S. Musa, J. Ya’u, W. Hamman, M. Isah, Sanusi Muhammad Bello, T. Yoshimatsu, Sabi Raouf Issa, Mahmoud Bukar Maina
{"title":"Simple models for neuroscience research discoveries: how often are these models used in Africa?","authors":"S. K. Hamidu, Ahmad Umar, R. Abdulazeez, Zaid Muhammad, A. I. Alkhamis, M. Umar, Ahmad Aliyu Ladan, F. Nasr, Aisha Ahmad, S. Musa, J. Ya’u, W. Hamman, M. Isah, Sanusi Muhammad Bello, T. Yoshimatsu, Sabi Raouf Issa, Mahmoud Bukar Maina","doi":"10.12688/molpsychol.17511.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Simple animal model systems such as Drosophila, Caenorhabditis Elegans and Zebrafish have enabled numerous breakthroughs in understanding human health and disease. Owing to their cheap maintenance cost, adopting these model systems will improve research in Africa. However, the extent to which these models are used across Africa is unknown. This study aimed to identify how often these models are used in Africa. Methods: We downloaded all the PUBMED-indexed publications from the year 2000 to 2021 that have an African affiliation and have mentioned Drosophila, C. elegans or Zebrafish. We manually curated the information on the experimental use of these model systems, author affiliations and details of funding from research publications. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the major hotspots for the use of the model systems and funders, and the pattern of local and international collaborations.   Results: Of the 1851 publications in which at least one of the models was mentioned, only 168 used at least one for the actual investigation. With an average of 21 articles per country, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia contributed 75% of these studies. The remaining 25% were contributed by seven other countries. Analysis of funding information revealed that 24.4% of the studies were exclusively locally funded, 28.57% exclusively internationally funded, 15.5% received both local and international funding, and the rest (31.5%) were unfunded, revealing that there is satisfactory access to funds for simple animal model studies, especially from external funders. By analysing the pattern of collaborations, we show that collaborations with researchers from other continents predominate over intra-Africa collbaorations. Conclusions: Our work provides data on the current state of research using simple model systems in African laboratories and argues that incorporating these models will advance biomedical science research in Africa.","PeriodicalId":74223,"journal":{"name":"Molecular psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/molpsychol.17511.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simple animal model systems such as Drosophila, Caenorhabditis Elegans and Zebrafish have enabled numerous breakthroughs in understanding human health and disease. Owing to their cheap maintenance cost, adopting these model systems will improve research in Africa. However, the extent to which these models are used across Africa is unknown. This study aimed to identify how often these models are used in Africa. Methods: We downloaded all the PUBMED-indexed publications from the year 2000 to 2021 that have an African affiliation and have mentioned Drosophila, C. elegans or Zebrafish. We manually curated the information on the experimental use of these model systems, author affiliations and details of funding from research publications. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the major hotspots for the use of the model systems and funders, and the pattern of local and international collaborations.   Results: Of the 1851 publications in which at least one of the models was mentioned, only 168 used at least one for the actual investigation. With an average of 21 articles per country, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia contributed 75% of these studies. The remaining 25% were contributed by seven other countries. Analysis of funding information revealed that 24.4% of the studies were exclusively locally funded, 28.57% exclusively internationally funded, 15.5% received both local and international funding, and the rest (31.5%) were unfunded, revealing that there is satisfactory access to funds for simple animal model studies, especially from external funders. By analysing the pattern of collaborations, we show that collaborations with researchers from other continents predominate over intra-Africa collbaorations. Conclusions: Our work provides data on the current state of research using simple model systems in African laboratories and argues that incorporating these models will advance biomedical science research in Africa.
神经科学研究发现的简单模型:这些模型在非洲使用的频率如何?
背景:简单的动物模型系统,如果蝇、秀丽隐杆线虫和斑马鱼,在理解人类健康和疾病方面取得了许多突破。由于它们的维护成本低廉,采用这些模式系统将改善非洲的研究。然而,这些模型在整个非洲的使用程度尚不清楚。这项研究旨在确定这些模型在非洲的使用频率。方法:我们下载了2000年至2021年间所有pubmed索引的与非洲有关并提到果蝇、秀丽隐杆线虫或斑马鱼的出版物。我们手动整理了这些模型系统的实验使用信息、作者关系和研究出版物的资助细节。使用描述性统计来描述使用模型系统和资助者的主要热点,以及地方和国际合作的模式。结果:在1851篇至少提到一种模型的出版物中,只有168篇在实际调查中至少使用了一种模型。南非、尼日利亚、肯尼亚、埃及、摩洛哥和突尼斯平均每个国家发表21篇文章,占这些研究的75%。其余25%由其他7个国家提供。对资助信息的分析显示,24.4%的研究完全由本地资助,28.57%的研究完全由国际资助,15.5%的研究同时获得本地和国际资助,其余31.5%的研究没有获得资助,这表明简单动物模型研究的资金获取情况令人满意,特别是来自外部资助。通过分析合作模式,我们表明与来自其他大陆的研究人员的合作在非洲内部合作中占主导地位。结论:我们的工作提供了关于非洲实验室使用简单模型系统的研究现状的数据,并认为纳入这些模型将促进非洲的生物医学科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信