Edwin Yingi, P. Hlungwani
{"title":"Electoral democracy and human rights during the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe","authors":"Edwin Yingi, P. Hlungwani","doi":"10.1080/14725843.2023.2167805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of COVID-19 ominously heralded a health crisis across the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the virus a public health emergency in January 2020 and the world became concerned with the havoc the disease would potentially cause. Though the pandemic was a health crisis, it posed a lethal challenge to shaky contemporary democracies across the world. Governments, including that of Zimbabwe, responded to the pandemic by enacting sweeping stringent lockdown regulations to control the spread of the disease. The regulations curtailed freedom of mobility, regulated public gatherings, and suspended electoral processes. This article looks at how the pandemic has been used to limit citizens' civil liberties, erode the tenets of democracy, profoundly altered the pre-existing democratic trajectory, and entrenched the Zimbabwe state on the path of authoritarianism. Through a review of available secondary literature, the study systematically analysed the political developments as reported in electronic (including social media-twitter) and print media during the pandemic. The study established that the response by the Zimbabwe government to the COVID-19 pandemic compromised the security of persons, undermined democracy and electoral processes. The health crisis presented an opportunity for the consolidation of authoritarian rule. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":35042,"journal":{"name":"African Identities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Identities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2023.2167805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
新冠肺炎疫情期间津巴布韦的选举民主和人权
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发不祥地预示着一场全球卫生危机。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2020年1月宣布该病毒为突发公共卫生事件,世界开始担心这种疾病可能造成的严重破坏。虽然大流行是一场健康危机,但它对世界各地摇摇欲坠的当代民主国家构成了致命的挑战。包括津巴布韦在内的各国政府通过颁布全面严格的封锁条例来应对这一流行病,以控制疾病的传播。这些规定限制了行动自由,限制了公众集会,并暂停了选举程序。本文着眼于疫情如何被用来限制公民的公民自由,侵蚀民主原则,深刻改变原有的民主轨迹,并使津巴布韦国家在威权主义道路上根深蒂固。通过对现有二手文献的审查,该研究系统地分析了大流行期间电子(包括社交媒体-twitter)和印刷媒体报道的政治发展情况。该研究确定,津巴布韦政府对COVID-19大流行的反应损害了人民的安全,破坏了民主和选举进程。这场健康危机为巩固独裁统治提供了机会。©2023 Informa UK Limited以Taylor & Francis Group的名义进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。