Contested destinies: Aboriginal advocacy in South Australia’s interwar years

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
R. Foster
{"title":"Contested destinies: Aboriginal advocacy in South Australia’s interwar years","authors":"R. Foster","doi":"10.22459/AH.42.2018.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the interwar years, as protection policies took hold across Australia, Aboriginal political organisations and advocacy groups emerged to protest and demand rights and freedoms. Among the better known of the Indigenous-led organisations were Fred Maynard’s Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association (AAPA) in New South Wales, and William Cooper’s Australian Aborigines’ League in Victoria. These were regional organisations fighting mostly local issues such as the injustices of life ‘under the Act’, or for better access to land and resources. However, they also engaged national issues, as exemplified by William Cooper’s Petition to the King, which was circulated throughout the country and called for reserved seats for Aboriginal people in federal parliament.1 More influential, however, were the white-run advocacy groups. The Association for the Protection of Native Races, established in 1911, had a national perspective and, among other things, sought greater federal control of Aboriginal affairs.2 The National Missionary Council, established in the mid-1920s, was a platform for many of the mainstream churches.3 More locally were groups such as the Australian Aborigines Ameliorative Association in Western Australia and the Victorian Aboriginal Group in Melbourne. As Attwood has observed, these were highly paternalistic organisations, who saw themselves working ‘for’ Aboriginal people ‘rather than through them’.4 This was certainly true of South Australia’s long-","PeriodicalId":42397,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.42.2018.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the interwar years, as protection policies took hold across Australia, Aboriginal political organisations and advocacy groups emerged to protest and demand rights and freedoms. Among the better known of the Indigenous-led organisations were Fred Maynard’s Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association (AAPA) in New South Wales, and William Cooper’s Australian Aborigines’ League in Victoria. These were regional organisations fighting mostly local issues such as the injustices of life ‘under the Act’, or for better access to land and resources. However, they also engaged national issues, as exemplified by William Cooper’s Petition to the King, which was circulated throughout the country and called for reserved seats for Aboriginal people in federal parliament.1 More influential, however, were the white-run advocacy groups. The Association for the Protection of Native Races, established in 1911, had a national perspective and, among other things, sought greater federal control of Aboriginal affairs.2 The National Missionary Council, established in the mid-1920s, was a platform for many of the mainstream churches.3 More locally were groups such as the Australian Aborigines Ameliorative Association in Western Australia and the Victorian Aboriginal Group in Melbourne. As Attwood has observed, these were highly paternalistic organisations, who saw themselves working ‘for’ Aboriginal people ‘rather than through them’.4 This was certainly true of South Australia’s long-
有争议的命运:南澳大利亚两次世界大战期间的原住民倡导
在两次世界大战期间,随着保护政策在澳大利亚各地站稳脚跟,原住民政治组织和倡导团体开始抗议并要求权利和自由。在土著领导的组织中,较为知名的有弗雷德·梅纳德(Fred Maynard)在新南威尔士州的澳大利亚土著进步协会(AAPA)和威廉·库珀(William Cooper)在维多利亚州的澳大利亚原住民联盟。这些地区组织主要与地方问题作斗争,如“根据该法案”的生活不公正,或争取更好地获得土地和资源。然而,他们也涉及国家问题,例如威廉·库珀的《国王请愿书》,该请愿书在全国各地流传,并呼吁在联邦议会中为原住民保留席位。1然而,更具影响力的是白人倡导团体。成立于1911年的土著民族保护协会从国家角度出发,寻求联邦政府对土著事务的更大控制。2成立于20世纪20年代中期的国家传教士委员会,是许多主流教会的平台。3更多的当地团体,如西澳大利亚的澳大利亚原住民改善协会和墨尔本的维多利亚原住民团体。正如阿特伍德所观察到的,这些组织都是高度家长式的组织,他们认为自己是“为‘原住民’工作,而不是通过他们”-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信