Obstetric Outcomes of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section: A Case-Control Study

Q3 Medicine
Z. Soleimani, A. Laluie, Arman Jenab, A. Soleimani
{"title":"Obstetric Outcomes of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Z. Soleimani, A. Laluie, Arman Jenab, A. Soleimani","doi":"10.30699/jambs.31.146.250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"10.30699/jambs.31.146.250 Background & Objective: Given the importance of the benefits of natural childbirth and the complications of recurrent cesarean section, we have conducted the present study to determine the maternal and neonatal complications of natural childbirth after cesarean section. Materials & Methods: In this case-control study, the obstetric complications of 84 women who had undergone a previous cesarean delivery referred to Baqiyatallah Hospital in 2018 for vaginal delivery after cesarean section (VBAC) delivery compared with 84 women with a previous vaginal delivery, who intended to give birth vaginally for the second delivery. Demographic, anthropometric, obstetric, and perinatal data of them were collected and registered in a researcher-developed form. Two groups were compared using the t-test and chi-square test. Results: The mean age in VBAC and control group was 30.49±6.83 and 32.08±7.28 years, respectively (P=0.15). There were not any occurrence of urinary rupture, bladder rupture, stool control disorder, uterine rupture, nephrotic infection, and ICU hospitalization of the mothers in the two groups. Regarding puerperal infection (3.57% in the VBAC group and 4.76% in the control group, P=0.69) and hospitalization of neonates in ICU (9.52% in the VBAC group and 5.95% in the control group, p=0.39), there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: It seems that the overall incidence of obstetric complications in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is low and not higher than those with prior vaginal delivery. Therefore, for the achievement of benefits of natural childbirth for both the mother and the fetus, women with a prior cesarean should be offered VBAC.","PeriodicalId":36550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/jambs.31.146.250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

10.30699/jambs.31.146.250 Background & Objective: Given the importance of the benefits of natural childbirth and the complications of recurrent cesarean section, we have conducted the present study to determine the maternal and neonatal complications of natural childbirth after cesarean section. Materials & Methods: In this case-control study, the obstetric complications of 84 women who had undergone a previous cesarean delivery referred to Baqiyatallah Hospital in 2018 for vaginal delivery after cesarean section (VBAC) delivery compared with 84 women with a previous vaginal delivery, who intended to give birth vaginally for the second delivery. Demographic, anthropometric, obstetric, and perinatal data of them were collected and registered in a researcher-developed form. Two groups were compared using the t-test and chi-square test. Results: The mean age in VBAC and control group was 30.49±6.83 and 32.08±7.28 years, respectively (P=0.15). There were not any occurrence of urinary rupture, bladder rupture, stool control disorder, uterine rupture, nephrotic infection, and ICU hospitalization of the mothers in the two groups. Regarding puerperal infection (3.57% in the VBAC group and 4.76% in the control group, P=0.69) and hospitalization of neonates in ICU (9.52% in the VBAC group and 5.95% in the control group, p=0.39), there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: It seems that the overall incidence of obstetric complications in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is low and not higher than those with prior vaginal delivery. Therefore, for the achievement of benefits of natural childbirth for both the mother and the fetus, women with a prior cesarean should be offered VBAC.
剖宫产后阴道分娩的产科结果:病例对照研究
背景与目的:考虑到自然分娩的益处和反复剖宫产的并发症的重要性,我们进行了本研究,以确定剖宫产后自然分娩的产妇和新生儿并发症。材料与方法:在本病例对照研究中,2018年84名既往剖宫产的妇女在剖宫产(VBAC)分娩后转至Baqiyatallah医院进行阴道分娩的产科并发症,与84名既往阴道分娩的妇女进行比较,她们打算顺产进行第二次分娩。收集了他们的人口统计、人体测量、产科和围产期数据,并以研究人员开发的形式进行了登记。两组比较采用t检验和卡方检验。结果:VBAC组和对照组的平均年龄分别为30.49±6.83岁和32.08±7.28岁(P=0.15)。两组产妇均未发生尿路破裂、膀胱破裂、大便控制障碍、子宫破裂、肾病感染、ICU住院。在产床感染发生率(VBAC组为3.57%,对照组为4.76%,P=0.69)和新生儿ICU住院率(VBAC组为9.52%,对照组为5.95%,P= 0.39)方面,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:剖宫产后阴道分娩的产妇产科并发症总体发生率较低,且不高于有阴道分娩史的产妇。因此,为了使自然分娩对母亲和胎儿都有好处,有过剖宫产史的妇女应该接受VBAC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信