El método en la Filosofía del Derecho y la Dogmática Penal

Q4 Social Sciences
L. Schonfeld
{"title":"El método en la Filosofía del Derecho y la Dogmática Penal","authors":"L. Schonfeld","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This work aims to highlight that criminal dogmatic has not received the cur-rent state of the philosophical debate. It will only address the issue of legal method and the consequences that, had they been received, would have had for criminal dogmatic. It is proposed to overcome the syllogistic-subsunctive method, both with respect to positive law and the concepts of crime theory and the consequent assumption of more Aristotelian open methods, such as topical and rhetoric. It will also be shown that such opening does not contradict the requirement of criminal legality.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.77-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This work aims to highlight that criminal dogmatic has not received the cur-rent state of the philosophical debate. It will only address the issue of legal method and the consequences that, had they been received, would have had for criminal dogmatic. It is proposed to overcome the syllogistic-subsunctive method, both with respect to positive law and the concepts of crime theory and the consequent assumption of more Aristotelian open methods, such as topical and rhetoric. It will also be shown that such opening does not contradict the requirement of criminal legality.
法律哲学和刑法教条的方法
:这部作品旨在强调刑事教条主义并没有受到哲学辩论的当前状态。它只会解决法律方法的问题,以及如果收到法律方法和后果,就会对刑事教条主义产生的后果。它被提议克服三段论的包含方法,无论是关于实证法和犯罪理论的概念,还是随之而来的对更亚里士多德开放方法的假设,如主题和修辞。还将表明,这种开放并不违背刑事合法性的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信