The co-occurrence of Ural Owls Strix uralensis and Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis differs between extensive and fragmented forests

Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00063657.2022.2026877
Izabela Fedyń, E. Grzędzicka, D. Wiehle, Ł. Kajtoch
{"title":"The co-occurrence of Ural Owls Strix uralensis and Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis differs between extensive and fragmented forests","authors":"Izabela Fedyń, E. Grzędzicka, D. Wiehle, Ł. Kajtoch","doi":"10.1080/00063657.2022.2026877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Capsule Territories of the nocturnal Ural Owl Strix uralensis and diurnal Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis were spatially associated in fragmented forest but not in extensive forest. Aims To test the hypotheses that (i) the patterns of distribution of Ural Owl and Northern Goshawk territories are different in extensive and fragmented forests and (ii) the distribution of their territories do not depend on local forest structure and habitat variables. Methods The territories of Northern Goshawks and Ural Owls were identified in forests in southern Poland. Spatial analysis was used to examine the co-occurrence patterns of the two species, and multivariate analysis to examine the impact of environmental cues on territory selection. Results Most habitat parameters were not significantly related to the presence of territories of either species. For Northern Goshawk there was a positive association with the occurrence of old-growth patches and a negative association with clear-cut areas and proximity to forest edge in fragmented forests; for Ural Owl there was a significant effect of wood type in extensive forest. None of the habitat parameters distinguished the territories of the two species, suggesting similarity in the habitats used. The territories of the two species were spatially associated in fragmented forests, suggesting some positive interspecific relationship. In contrast, the distributions of the two species were not significantly associated in extensive forest. Conclusions To explain the spatial co-occurrence between Northern Goshawks and Ural Owls we suggest: (i) Ural Owls can occupy unused Northern Goshawk nests in managed extensive forest where there is a deficiency of large tree cavities; (ii) restricted availability of habitat in fragmented forests forces both species to nest in close proximity, and/or (iii) Ural Owls use social information from Northern Goshawks about habitat quality when selecting territories in some landscapes.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2022.2026877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Capsule Territories of the nocturnal Ural Owl Strix uralensis and diurnal Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis were spatially associated in fragmented forest but not in extensive forest. Aims To test the hypotheses that (i) the patterns of distribution of Ural Owl and Northern Goshawk territories are different in extensive and fragmented forests and (ii) the distribution of their territories do not depend on local forest structure and habitat variables. Methods The territories of Northern Goshawks and Ural Owls were identified in forests in southern Poland. Spatial analysis was used to examine the co-occurrence patterns of the two species, and multivariate analysis to examine the impact of environmental cues on territory selection. Results Most habitat parameters were not significantly related to the presence of territories of either species. For Northern Goshawk there was a positive association with the occurrence of old-growth patches and a negative association with clear-cut areas and proximity to forest edge in fragmented forests; for Ural Owl there was a significant effect of wood type in extensive forest. None of the habitat parameters distinguished the territories of the two species, suggesting similarity in the habitats used. The territories of the two species were spatially associated in fragmented forests, suggesting some positive interspecific relationship. In contrast, the distributions of the two species were not significantly associated in extensive forest. Conclusions To explain the spatial co-occurrence between Northern Goshawks and Ural Owls we suggest: (i) Ural Owls can occupy unused Northern Goshawk nests in managed extensive forest where there is a deficiency of large tree cavities; (ii) restricted availability of habitat in fragmented forests forces both species to nest in close proximity, and/or (iii) Ural Owls use social information from Northern Goshawks about habitat quality when selecting territories in some landscapes.
分享
查看原文
乌拉尔猫头鹰(Strix uralensis)和北方苍鹰(Accipiter gentilis)在粗放森林和破碎森林中的共存情况不同
夜间活动的乌拉尔猫头鹰(Strix uralensis)和日间活动的北方苍鹰(Accipiter gentilis)的蒴果领地在破碎林中存在空间关联,而在粗放林中不存在。目的验证乌拉尔猫头鹰和北方苍鹰的领地分布模式在粗放型和破碎型森林中存在差异,以及它们的领地分布不依赖于当地森林结构和栖息地变量的假设。方法在波兰南部森林中对北苍鹰和乌拉尔猫头鹰的领地进行鉴定。利用空间分析方法研究了两种物种的共生模式,并利用多变量分析方法研究了环境因素对领地选择的影响。结果大多数生境参数与两种物种的领地存在不显著相关。对北苍鹰来说,与原始生长斑块的发生呈正相关,而与破碎森林中砍伐面积和靠近森林边缘呈负相关;对于乌拉尔猫头鹰来说,在广阔的森林中,木材类型对其有显著的影响。没有任何栖息地参数能区分这两个物种的领地,这表明它们所使用的栖息地相似。在破碎林中,两种的领地在空间上是相关的,表明存在一定的种间关系。而在阔叶林中,两种植物的分布没有显著的相关性。结论为解释北苍鹰与乌拉尔猫头鹰的空间共现现象,我们认为:(1)乌拉尔猫头鹰可以在缺乏大树洞的有管理的广阔森林中占据未使用的北苍鹰巢穴;(ii)在破碎的森林中,栖息地的有限性迫使这两个物种在附近筑巢,和/或(iii)乌拉尔猫头鹰在某些景观中选择栖息地时,使用北苍鹰的社会信息来选择栖息地质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信