Von der Barmherzigkeit zum Empowerment?! Zur theologischen Entwicklung ethischer Kriterien der Inklusion

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Frank Martin Brunn
{"title":"Von der Barmherzigkeit zum Empowerment?! Zur theologischen Entwicklung ethischer Kriterien der Inklusion","authors":"Frank Martin Brunn","doi":"10.14315/zee-2020-640406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.","PeriodicalId":41129,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","volume":"64 1","pages":"263 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2020-640406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.
从仁慈到赋权?!论包容伦理标准的神学发展
在这篇文章中,我描述了基于仁慈价值观的十二生肖精神的结构性弱点。从理论上讲,它应该被旨在加强自主性的赋权精神所超越。我首先描述了神学伦理学在残疾人及其融入方面面临的历史挑战。然后,我提出了内在的不对称的仁慈结构,它倾向于家长式作风。我反对家长式作风,理解自主,这是受化身现象学的启发。我根据十字架神学及其现象学含义来解释这一点。最后,我得出了包容的道德标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信