{"title":"Von der Barmherzigkeit zum Empowerment?! Zur theologischen Entwicklung ethischer Kriterien der Inklusion","authors":"Frank Martin Brunn","doi":"10.14315/zee-2020-640406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.","PeriodicalId":41129,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","volume":"64 1","pages":"263 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2020-640406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.