Credible Commitment or Sham Devotion to the International Criminal Court: Whither Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda?

IF 0.4 Q4 LAW
S. Anya, Adrian Osuagwu, E. Onyeabor, J. Okubuiro, Matthew Nwankwo, Daniel Onyeonagu, I. Enemo
{"title":"Credible Commitment or Sham Devotion to the International Criminal Court: Whither Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda?","authors":"S. Anya, Adrian Osuagwu, E. Onyeabor, J. Okubuiro, Matthew Nwankwo, Daniel Onyeonagu, I. Enemo","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThere is a pattern of inconsistent behaviour among some African states towards the International Criminal Court (ICC) showing credible commitment and sham devotion. This study poses a question: what will be of the status of Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda (the Triad) vis-à-vis the ICC by the end of 2023, considering the pattern of behaviour of these states so far, evidence from data and the spate of domestication and exit procedures in homogeneous African states in contemporary times? The objectives of the study are to predict the status of the Triad by 2023 and reflect on the implication of the predictions for the on-going viability, sustainability and credibility challenges facing the ICC in Africa. The study finds that: the pattern of Nigeria’s behaviour shows sham devotion and predicts that she will not domesticate the Rome Statute come 2023; the pattern of Kenya’s behaviour straddles credible commitment and sham devotion and she may maintain her membership of the ICC by 2023; the pattern of Uganda’s behaviour shows fairly credible commitment mixed with sham devotion and she will maintain her membership of the Statute come 2023. These predictions have implications on the ongoing viability, sustainability and credibility challenges facing the ICC in Africa.","PeriodicalId":41565,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-bja10078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a pattern of inconsistent behaviour among some African states towards the International Criminal Court (ICC) showing credible commitment and sham devotion. This study poses a question: what will be of the status of Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda (the Triad) vis-à-vis the ICC by the end of 2023, considering the pattern of behaviour of these states so far, evidence from data and the spate of domestication and exit procedures in homogeneous African states in contemporary times? The objectives of the study are to predict the status of the Triad by 2023 and reflect on the implication of the predictions for the on-going viability, sustainability and credibility challenges facing the ICC in Africa. The study finds that: the pattern of Nigeria’s behaviour shows sham devotion and predicts that she will not domesticate the Rome Statute come 2023; the pattern of Kenya’s behaviour straddles credible commitment and sham devotion and she may maintain her membership of the ICC by 2023; the pattern of Uganda’s behaviour shows fairly credible commitment mixed with sham devotion and she will maintain her membership of the Statute come 2023. These predictions have implications on the ongoing viability, sustainability and credibility challenges facing the ICC in Africa.
国际刑事法院:尼日利亚、肯尼亚和乌干达何去何从?
一些非洲国家对国际刑事法院的行为不一致,表现出可信的承诺和虚假的奉献。这项研究提出了一个问题:考虑到尼日利亚、肯尼亚和乌干达迄今为止的行为模式、数据证据以及当代同质非洲国家的大量归化和退出程序,到2023年底,它们在国际刑事法院中的地位如何?该研究的目标是预测到2023年Triad的状况,并反思这些预测对ICC在非洲面临的持续生存能力、可持续性和可信度挑战的影响。研究发现:尼日利亚的行为模式显示出虚假的虔诚,并预测她不会在2023年将《罗马规约》本土化;肯尼亚的行为模式跨越了可信的承诺和虚假的奉献,她可能在2023年前保持国际刑事法院的成员资格;乌干达的行为模式显示出相当可信的承诺和虚假的奉献,她将在2023年继续担任《规约》的成员。这些预测对国际刑事法院在非洲面临的持续生存能力、可持续性和信誉挑战产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Legal Studies (AJLS) is a peer-reviewed and interdisciplinary academic journal focusing on human rights and rule of law issues in Africa as analyzed by lawyers, economists, political scientists and others drawn from throughout the continent and the world. The journal, which was established by the Africa Law Institute and is now co-published in collaboration with Brill | Nijhoff, aims to serve as the leading forum for the thoughtful and scholarly engagement of a broad range of complex issues at the intersection of law, public policy and social change in Africa. AJLS places emphasis on presenting a diversity of perspectives on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems of human rights and governance, as well as emerging issues, and possible solutions to them. Towards this end, AJLS encourages critical reflections that are based on empirical observations and experience as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书