Comparison of Direct Runoff Values Between Numerical Model and Convolution of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method

Cleon Christopher, B. Ginting, D. Yudianto, Albert Wicaksono
{"title":"Comparison of Direct Runoff Values Between Numerical Model and Convolution of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method","authors":"Cleon Christopher, B. Ginting, D. Yudianto, Albert Wicaksono","doi":"10.14710/mkts.v28i1.42309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the results of direct runoff obtained by a numerical model of the shallow water equations (SWE) with the synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods generally used in Indonesia. It is known that such SUH methods are still empirical, thus making it difficult for users to determine a representative method. Meanwhile, the hydrodynamic approach such as the SWE numerical model can achieve more accurate results in predicting the direct runoff compared to the SUH methods, because the model itself is derived mathematically based on the physical processes. The findings indicate that the direct runoff predicted using the SWE numerical model (HEC-RAS 5.0.7) produced more accurate results for the peak discharge with an average error of -0.07%, the peak time with an average error of 19.77%, and the shape of the hydrograph with the smallest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from all the cases tested. Therefore, it can be concluded that in the future the use of a hydrodynamic approach is highly recommended for the direct runoff prediction. This paper was also aimed to be used as a reference in the development of new, more accurate SUH method in the future.","PeriodicalId":31880,"journal":{"name":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v28i1.42309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares the results of direct runoff obtained by a numerical model of the shallow water equations (SWE) with the synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods generally used in Indonesia. It is known that such SUH methods are still empirical, thus making it difficult for users to determine a representative method. Meanwhile, the hydrodynamic approach such as the SWE numerical model can achieve more accurate results in predicting the direct runoff compared to the SUH methods, because the model itself is derived mathematically based on the physical processes. The findings indicate that the direct runoff predicted using the SWE numerical model (HEC-RAS 5.0.7) produced more accurate results for the peak discharge with an average error of -0.07%, the peak time with an average error of 19.77%, and the shape of the hydrograph with the smallest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from all the cases tested. Therefore, it can be concluded that in the future the use of a hydrodynamic approach is highly recommended for the direct runoff prediction. This paper was also aimed to be used as a reference in the development of new, more accurate SUH method in the future.
综合单元线法卷积与数值模型直接径流量的比较
本文将浅水方程(SWE)数值模型与印度尼西亚常用的合成单位线(SUH)方法所得到的直接径流结果进行了比较。众所周知,这种SUH方法仍然是经验性的,因此用户很难确定一种具有代表性的方法。同时,由于SWE数值模型本身是基于物理过程的数学推导,因此与SUH方法相比,水动力方法如SWE数值模型在预测直接径流方面可以获得更准确的结果。结果表明,采用SWE数值模型(HEC-RAS 5.0.7)预测的直接径流量峰值误差为-0.07%,峰值时间平均误差为19.77%,水流形状的均方根误差(RMSE)最小。因此,可以得出结论,未来强烈建议使用水动力学方法进行直接径流预测。为今后开发新的、精度更高的SUH方法提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书