Long-term option pricing with a lower reflecting barrier

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
R. Thomas
{"title":"Long-term option pricing with a lower reflecting barrier","authors":"R. Thomas","doi":"10.1017/S1748499522000227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper considers the pricing of long-term options on assets such as housing, where either government intervention or the economic nature of the asset limits large falls in prices. The observed asset price is modelled by a geometric Brownian motion (“the notional price”) reflected at a lower barrier. The resulting observed price has standard dynamics but with localised intervention at the barrier, which allows arbitrage with interim losses; this is funded by the government’s unlimited powers of intervention, and its exploitation is subject to credit constraints. Despite the lack of an equivalent martingale measure for the observed price, options on this price can be expressed as compound options on the arbitrage-free notional price, to which standard risk-neutral arguments can be applied. Because option deltas tend to zero when the observed price approaches the barrier, hedging with the observed price gives the same results as hedging with the notional price and so exactly replicates option payoffs. Hedging schemes are not unique, with the cheapest scheme for any derivative being the one which best exploits the interventions at the barrier. The price of a put is clear: direct replication has a lower initial cost than synthetic replication, and the replication portfolio always has positive value. The price of a call is ambiguous: synthetic replication has a lower initial cost than direct replication, but the replication portfolio may give interim losses. So the preferred replication strategy (and hence price) of a call depends on what margin payments need to be made on these losses.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499522000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper considers the pricing of long-term options on assets such as housing, where either government intervention or the economic nature of the asset limits large falls in prices. The observed asset price is modelled by a geometric Brownian motion (“the notional price”) reflected at a lower barrier. The resulting observed price has standard dynamics but with localised intervention at the barrier, which allows arbitrage with interim losses; this is funded by the government’s unlimited powers of intervention, and its exploitation is subject to credit constraints. Despite the lack of an equivalent martingale measure for the observed price, options on this price can be expressed as compound options on the arbitrage-free notional price, to which standard risk-neutral arguments can be applied. Because option deltas tend to zero when the observed price approaches the barrier, hedging with the observed price gives the same results as hedging with the notional price and so exactly replicates option payoffs. Hedging schemes are not unique, with the cheapest scheme for any derivative being the one which best exploits the interventions at the barrier. The price of a put is clear: direct replication has a lower initial cost than synthetic replication, and the replication portfolio always has positive value. The price of a call is ambiguous: synthetic replication has a lower initial cost than direct replication, but the replication portfolio may give interim losses. So the preferred replication strategy (and hence price) of a call depends on what margin payments need to be made on these losses.
具有较低反映障碍的长期期权定价
本文考虑了住房等资产的长期期权定价,其中政府干预或资产的经济性质限制了价格的大幅下跌。观察到的资产价格由几何布朗运动(“名义价格”)建模,反映在较低的障碍处。由此观察到的价格具有标准动态,但在障碍处进行了局部干预,从而允许套利,同时遭受中期损失;这是由政府不受限制的干预力量提供资金的,其开发受制于信贷约束。尽管对观察到的价格缺乏等效的鞅度量,但该价格的期权可以表示为无套利名义价格的复合期权,可以应用标准风险中性参数。因为当观察到的价格接近障碍时,期权delta趋于零,用观察到的价格进行套期保值与用名义价格进行套期保值的结果相同,因此完全复制了期权收益。对冲方案并非独一无二,对于任何衍生品而言,最便宜的方案都是最能利用价格障碍处的干预的方案。看跌期权的价格是明确的:直接复制的初始成本低于合成复制,并且复制投资组合始终具有正价值。调用的价格是不明确的:合成复制的初始成本低于直接复制,但复制组合可能会造成临时损失。因此,看涨期权的首选复制策略(以及价格)取决于需要为这些损失支付多少保证金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信