Mixed methods analysis of reflective statements of residents following the developmental-behavioral pediatric rotation

Nicole Fledderman, Lillian J Slavin, Daniel D. Drevon, Neelkamal Soares
{"title":"Mixed methods analysis of reflective statements of residents following the developmental-behavioral pediatric rotation","authors":"Nicole Fledderman, Lillian J Slavin, Daniel D. Drevon, Neelkamal Soares","doi":"10.21037/pm-21-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reflection is important in the professional practice of medicine, and analyses of trainees' reflection papers have been utilized to evaluate training outcomes. This study was to determine the degree of reflection of residents completing the developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) rotation, which provides a high degree of interprofessional and family-centered experiences. We sought to explore whether level of reflection was correlated with timing of the rotation [earlier or later in training year, before or since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic]. Method(s): This retrospective study included deidentified reflection statements of Pediatrics (Peds) and Medicine-Pediatrics (Med-Peds) residents after their DBP rotation from 2017-2021. Level of reflection for each of four categories of prompts, leadership, interdisciplinary, family-centered, and equity (LIFE), which codifies 12 Maternal Child Health (MCH) competencies, and ideally reflect the principles of the DBP rotation. The prompts were coded using a five-point Castleberry rating. Result(s): Thirty-six residents completed reflections, 58% completed the rotation prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 44% completed the rotation early in their academic year. Mean Castleberry ratings were 3.2 [standard deviation (SD) =0.7], 2.7 (SD =0.8), 2.6 (SD =1.0), and 2.6 (SD =0.8) for LIFE, respectively. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests tested differences in Castleberry ratings for each facet of the LIFE framework by timing of rotation vis-a-vis the COVID-19 pandemic and early or late in the training year. We found statistically significant lower results for interdisciplinary (I) facet of the LIFE framework in those who completed the rotation late in the training year (W=214.50;P=0.02). Conclusion(s): Peds and Med-Peds residents reflect moderately on their DBP rotation, and more on leadership than other aspects integral to DBP practice. Future research is needed to compare reflections on the LIFE framework across different rotations, and thematic/sentiment analysis can reveal opportunities for guiding residents on the reflection process.Copyright © Pediatric Medicine. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":74411,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reflection is important in the professional practice of medicine, and analyses of trainees' reflection papers have been utilized to evaluate training outcomes. This study was to determine the degree of reflection of residents completing the developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) rotation, which provides a high degree of interprofessional and family-centered experiences. We sought to explore whether level of reflection was correlated with timing of the rotation [earlier or later in training year, before or since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic]. Method(s): This retrospective study included deidentified reflection statements of Pediatrics (Peds) and Medicine-Pediatrics (Med-Peds) residents after their DBP rotation from 2017-2021. Level of reflection for each of four categories of prompts, leadership, interdisciplinary, family-centered, and equity (LIFE), which codifies 12 Maternal Child Health (MCH) competencies, and ideally reflect the principles of the DBP rotation. The prompts were coded using a five-point Castleberry rating. Result(s): Thirty-six residents completed reflections, 58% completed the rotation prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 44% completed the rotation early in their academic year. Mean Castleberry ratings were 3.2 [standard deviation (SD) =0.7], 2.7 (SD =0.8), 2.6 (SD =1.0), and 2.6 (SD =0.8) for LIFE, respectively. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests tested differences in Castleberry ratings for each facet of the LIFE framework by timing of rotation vis-a-vis the COVID-19 pandemic and early or late in the training year. We found statistically significant lower results for interdisciplinary (I) facet of the LIFE framework in those who completed the rotation late in the training year (W=214.50;P=0.02). Conclusion(s): Peds and Med-Peds residents reflect moderately on their DBP rotation, and more on leadership than other aspects integral to DBP practice. Future research is needed to compare reflections on the LIFE framework across different rotations, and thematic/sentiment analysis can reveal opportunities for guiding residents on the reflection process.Copyright © Pediatric Medicine. All rights reserved.
发展-行为儿科轮转后住院医师反思陈述的混合方法分析
背景:反思在医学专业实践中很重要,对学员反思论文的分析已被用于评估培训结果。本研究旨在确定住院医师完成发展-行为儿科(DBP)轮转的反映程度,DBP轮转提供了高度的跨专业和以家庭为中心的经验。我们试图探索反思水平是否与轮岗时间(在培训年度的更早或更晚,在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前或之后)相关。方法:本回顾性研究包括2017-2021年DBP轮转后儿科(Peds)和医学-儿科(Med-Peds)住院医师的未识别反思陈述。对提示、领导、跨学科、以家庭为中心和公平(LIFE)四类中的每一类的反映程度,其中编纂了12项妇幼保健(MCH)能力,并理想地反映了DBP轮转原则。这些提示使用5分的Castleberry评级进行编码。结果:36名住院医生完成了反思,58%的人在COVID-19大流行之前完成了轮岗,44%的人在学年早期完成了轮岗。Castleberry对LIFE的平均评分分别为3.2[标准差(SD) =0.7]、2.7 (SD =0.8)、2.6 (SD =1.0)和2.6 (SD =0.8)。Wilcoxon秩和测试通过针对COVID-19大流行的轮换时间以及培训年度的早期或后期来测试LIFE框架各方面的Castleberry评分差异。我们发现在培训年末完成轮转的患者在LIFE框架的跨学科(I)方面的结果具有统计学意义(W=214.50;P=0.02)。结论:儿科和医学-儿科住院医师在舒张术轮转方面反映一般,在舒张术实践中,领导能力比其他方面反映更多。未来的研究需要比较不同轮换对生活框架的反思,主题/情感分析可以揭示指导居民反思过程的机会。版权所有©儿科医学。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信