Understanding Children’s Power in Bangladesh’s Informal Settlements

IF 1.1 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
H. Hamilton, Vicky Walters, G. Prinsen
{"title":"Understanding Children’s Power in Bangladesh’s Informal Settlements","authors":"H. Hamilton, Vicky Walters, G. Prinsen","doi":"10.1080/08039410.2021.1931433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores power from the perspectives of children living in informal settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It draws on empirical evidence gathered through visual, task-based methods with a small group of children and insights from post-structuralism, development sociology and the anthropology and political economy of Bangladesh to argue that children’s power in Dhaka’s informal settlements can be understood not as an instrument some agents use to alter the independent action of others, but as a network of boundaries that delimit the field of children’s social imagination and possibility. To do this, we introduce children’s participation in development studies, showing that the trend has been to exclude children’s perspectives. We give an overview of how power has been conceptualized, drawing on insights from post-structuralism and development sociology to present a theoretical framework for how the child participants in this research understood power. Drawing on contextual literature, we then introduce five boundaries of power which constrain and enable agency for children in Dhaka’s bastees. The visual, task-based methods we employed with a small group of child participants are introduced. We then discuss five boundaries of power from the perspectives of our research participants: social relationships; financial resources; the natural environment; education and children’s work. Drawing links from these findings to existing theories of power, the article concludes by arguing that the operation of power for children in Dhaka’s bastees can be understood as a network of boundaries that delimit fields of social imagination and possibility.","PeriodicalId":45207,"journal":{"name":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08039410.2021.1931433","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1931433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article explores power from the perspectives of children living in informal settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It draws on empirical evidence gathered through visual, task-based methods with a small group of children and insights from post-structuralism, development sociology and the anthropology and political economy of Bangladesh to argue that children’s power in Dhaka’s informal settlements can be understood not as an instrument some agents use to alter the independent action of others, but as a network of boundaries that delimit the field of children’s social imagination and possibility. To do this, we introduce children’s participation in development studies, showing that the trend has been to exclude children’s perspectives. We give an overview of how power has been conceptualized, drawing on insights from post-structuralism and development sociology to present a theoretical framework for how the child participants in this research understood power. Drawing on contextual literature, we then introduce five boundaries of power which constrain and enable agency for children in Dhaka’s bastees. The visual, task-based methods we employed with a small group of child participants are introduced. We then discuss five boundaries of power from the perspectives of our research participants: social relationships; financial resources; the natural environment; education and children’s work. Drawing links from these findings to existing theories of power, the article concludes by arguing that the operation of power for children in Dhaka’s bastees can be understood as a network of boundaries that delimit fields of social imagination and possibility.
了解孟加拉国非正规住区中儿童的力量
摘要本文从孟加拉国达卡非正规住区儿童的角度探讨权力。它借鉴了通过对一小群儿童的视觉、基于任务的方法收集的经验证据,以及后结构主义、发展社会学、孟加拉国人类学和政治经济学的见解,认为达卡非正规住区的儿童权力不能被理解为一些代理人用来改变他人独立行动的工具,而是作为一个界限网络,划定了儿童社会想象和可能性的领域。为了做到这一点,我们介绍了儿童参与发展研究的情况,表明趋势是排斥儿童的观点。我们概述了权力是如何概念化的,借鉴了后结构主义和发展社会学的见解,为本研究中的儿童参与者如何理解权力提供了一个理论框架。根据上下文文献,我们介绍了五种权力边界,这些边界限制并允许达卡巴斯蒂的儿童代理。介绍了我们在一小群儿童参与者中采用的视觉化、基于任务的方法。然后,我们从研究参与者的角度讨论了权力的五个边界:社会关系;财政资源;自然环境;教育和儿童工作。文章将这些发现与现有的权力理论联系起来,得出结论认为,达卡后裔中儿童的权力运作可以被理解为一个界限网络,划定了社会想象和可能性的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Forum for Development Studies was established in 1974, and soon became the leading Norwegian journal for development research. While this position has been consolidated, Forum has gradually become an international journal, with its main constituency in the Nordic countries. The journal is owned by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and the Norwegian Association for Development Research. Forum aims to be a platform for development research broadly defined – including the social sciences, economics, history and law. All articles are double-blind peer-reviewed. In order to maintain the journal as a meeting place for different disciplines, we encourage authors to communicate across disciplinary boundaries. Contributions that limit the use of exclusive terminology and frame the questions explored in ways that are accessible to the whole range of the Journal''s readership will be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信