Pain self-efficacy questionnaire and its use in samples with different pain duration time

F. Bonafé, J. Marôco, J. Campos
{"title":"Pain self-efficacy questionnaire and its use in samples with different pain duration time","authors":"F. Bonafé, J. Marôco, J. Campos","doi":"10.5935/2595-0118.20180008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pain self-efficacy questionnaire has been frequently used in several languages, but its use is limited to chronic pain. This study aimed to i) evaluate the properties of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire among Brazilians with different durations of pain occurrence; ii) present a new proposal for estimation of the overall self-efficacy belief score; and iii) compare such score among different pain duration time. METHODS: A total of 1,155 adults (79.0% women; 38.6±10.8 years) participated, 337 had no pain, 386 reported pain for less than 3 months, 253 reported pain for more than 3 months with a recurrent pattern, and 179 reported continuous pain for more than 3 months. The confirmatory factor analysis was performed to check the pain self-efficacy questionnaire unifactorial model good-fit. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire invariance was tested in independent samples using multigroup analysis. We proposed the calculation of the self-efficacy belief score from the factor score obtained in the confirmatory factor analysis. The score was compared among groups (ANOVA, alpha=5%). RESULTS: After inserting four correlations between errors of items, the pain self-efficacy questionnaire model shows to be fit to the sample (X2/df=7.059; CFI=0.978; GFI=0.964; RMSEA=0.072). The model was invariant between independent samples. Lower self-efficacy belief was found among participants with pain for less than three months (p<0.05). Pain self-efficacy questionnaire and its use in samples with different pain duration time","PeriodicalId":30846,"journal":{"name":"Revista Dor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Dor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20180008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pain self-efficacy questionnaire has been frequently used in several languages, but its use is limited to chronic pain. This study aimed to i) evaluate the properties of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire among Brazilians with different durations of pain occurrence; ii) present a new proposal for estimation of the overall self-efficacy belief score; and iii) compare such score among different pain duration time. METHODS: A total of 1,155 adults (79.0% women; 38.6±10.8 years) participated, 337 had no pain, 386 reported pain for less than 3 months, 253 reported pain for more than 3 months with a recurrent pattern, and 179 reported continuous pain for more than 3 months. The confirmatory factor analysis was performed to check the pain self-efficacy questionnaire unifactorial model good-fit. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire invariance was tested in independent samples using multigroup analysis. We proposed the calculation of the self-efficacy belief score from the factor score obtained in the confirmatory factor analysis. The score was compared among groups (ANOVA, alpha=5%). RESULTS: After inserting four correlations between errors of items, the pain self-efficacy questionnaire model shows to be fit to the sample (X2/df=7.059; CFI=0.978; GFI=0.964; RMSEA=0.072). The model was invariant between independent samples. Lower self-efficacy belief was found among participants with pain for less than three months (p<0.05). Pain self-efficacy questionnaire and its use in samples with different pain duration time
疼痛自我效能感问卷及其在不同疼痛持续时间样本中的应用
背景与目的:疼痛自我效能问卷已被多种语言频繁使用,但其使用仅限于慢性疼痛。本研究旨在1)评估不同疼痛发生持续时间的巴西人疼痛自我效能感问卷的性质;Ii)提出了一种新的自我效能感信念总分估计方法;iii)比较不同疼痛持续时间的评分。方法:共1155名成年人(79.0%为女性;(38.6±10.8年),337例无疼痛,386例疼痛持续时间小于3个月,253例疼痛持续时间大于3个月,179例疼痛持续时间大于3个月。采用验证性因子分析检验疼痛自我效能问卷单因子模型的拟合性。采用多组分析对独立样本进行疼痛自我效能问卷的不变性检验。我们提出从验证性因子分析中获得的因子得分计算自我效能信念得分。组间比较评分(方差分析,α =5%)。结果:插入4个项目误差相关后,疼痛自我效能问卷模型与样本拟合良好(X2/df=7.059;CFI = 0.978;GFI = 0.964;RMSEA = 0.072)。模型在独立样本之间是不变的。疼痛持续时间小于3个月的受试者自我效能感较低(p<0.05)。疼痛自我效能感问卷及其在不同疼痛持续时间样本中的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信