Indications and Complications of Orthopedic Hardware Removal in an Indonesian Tertiary Hospital: A Descriptive Study

Shadrina Affifa Azzahra, R. Primadhi, Titing Nurhayati, Muhammad Naseh Sajadi, A. Achadiyani
{"title":"Indications and Complications of Orthopedic Hardware Removal in an Indonesian Tertiary Hospital: A Descriptive Study","authors":"Shadrina Affifa Azzahra, R. Primadhi, Titing Nurhayati, Muhammad Naseh Sajadi, A. Achadiyani","doi":"10.15850/ijihs.v10n1.2695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To acquire clinical data regarding indications of implant removal and complications in orthopedic metal implant removal. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational descriptive study using patient medical records. The inclusion criterion was all patients who underwent orthopedic metal implant removal during 2018-2020 while the exclusion criterion was unintentional implant removal due to subsequent injury or loosening. Data regarding anatomic regions, indications, and complications were collected and presented in tables. Results: In 112 patients participated in this study consisting of 75 (67%) men and 37 (33%) women, the implants were mainly located in thigh, lower leg, and ankle (53% combined). The most common indication for metal implant removal was conversion (31%), followed by infection (25%) and patient's request (20%). The only complication observed in orthopedic metal implant removal in this study was disturbed wound healing in a small percentage of the patients (16%). Most patients (84%) did not experience any complication due to metal implant removal. Conclusions: Indications for metal implant removal may vary, with or without symptoms. Disturbed wound healing is a complication observed in metal implant removal. Despite the advantages of removal, further analysis and guidelines are needed to avoid unnecessary hardware removal considering the risk of complications.","PeriodicalId":30637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15850/ijihs.v10n1.2695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To acquire clinical data regarding indications of implant removal and complications in orthopedic metal implant removal. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational descriptive study using patient medical records. The inclusion criterion was all patients who underwent orthopedic metal implant removal during 2018-2020 while the exclusion criterion was unintentional implant removal due to subsequent injury or loosening. Data regarding anatomic regions, indications, and complications were collected and presented in tables. Results: In 112 patients participated in this study consisting of 75 (67%) men and 37 (33%) women, the implants were mainly located in thigh, lower leg, and ankle (53% combined). The most common indication for metal implant removal was conversion (31%), followed by infection (25%) and patient's request (20%). The only complication observed in orthopedic metal implant removal in this study was disturbed wound healing in a small percentage of the patients (16%). Most patients (84%) did not experience any complication due to metal implant removal. Conclusions: Indications for metal implant removal may vary, with or without symptoms. Disturbed wound healing is a complication observed in metal implant removal. Despite the advantages of removal, further analysis and guidelines are needed to avoid unnecessary hardware removal considering the risk of complications.
印度尼西亚一家三级医院骨科硬体取出的适应症和并发症:一项描述性研究
目的:了解骨科金属植入物摘除的适应证及并发症的临床资料。方法:这是一项使用患者医疗记录的横断面观察性描述性研究。纳入标准为2018-2020年间接受骨科金属植入物移除的所有患者,而排除标准为由于随后的损伤或松动而非故意移除植入物。收集有关解剖区域、适应症和并发症的数据,并在表格中列出。结果:在参与本研究的112名患者中,包括75名(67%)男性和37名(33%)女性,植入物主要位于大腿、小腿和脚踝(53%)。移除金属植入物最常见的适应症是转换(31%),其次是感染(25%)和患者要求(20%)。在这项研究中,在骨科金属植入物移除中观察到的唯一并发症是一小部分患者(16%)的伤口愈合受到干扰。大多数患者(84%)没有因移除金属植入物而出现任何并发症。结论:移除金属植入物的适应症可能会有所不同,无论是否有症状。在移除金属植入物的过程中,创伤愈合受到干扰是一种并发症。尽管移除有好处,但考虑到并发症的风险,仍需要进一步的分析和指导,以避免不必要的硬件移除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信