Clinical outcomes of intussusception: The experience in Johannesburg, South Africa

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
V. Khumalo, A. Witthers, B. Jugmohan, C. Westgarth-Taylor, A. Grieve, D. Harrison, J. Loveland
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of intussusception: The experience in Johannesburg, South Africa","authors":"V. Khumalo, A. Witthers, B. Jugmohan, C. Westgarth-Taylor, A. Grieve, D. Harrison, J. Loveland","doi":"10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i1.1924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. A previous study on intussusception from our institution demonstrated a pneumatic reduction (PR) rate of 33%, witha mortality rate of 9.1%. Numerous protocol changes were implemented, and as part of a national prospective observational study, asubsequent cohort of patients was compared with the initial series.Objectives. To compare our current series of children presenting with intussusception with our previous series. Specifically, we aimed tocompare PR rates, resection rates, morbidity and mortality.Methods. This was a retrospective review of patients aged <3 years who presented with intussusception to Chris Hani BaragwanathAcademic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, from 2011 to 2015 (era 2). Clinical outcomes of patients and management modalitieswere reviewed. These were compared with results reported in the previous article (2007 - 2010, era 1).Results. A total of 111 patients were included. PR was attempted in 52 patients (46.8%). It was successful in 25 patients (48.1%) andunsuccessful in 27 (51.9%), with an overall success rate of 22.5%. Eighty-six patients (77.5%) underwent surgical intervention. Bowelresection was performed in 54/86 of the surgically managed patients. No deaths were reported during the era 2 study period.Conclusion. Despite improved protocols, we could not demonstrate an improvement in the proportion of attempted PR cases comparedwith our previous series, and we did not achieve better PR rates. This failure is thought to be due to the delayed presentation of our patients,as well as an aggressive approach to management. However, this aggressive management strategy has decreased our mortality rate to zero.","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i1.1924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. A previous study on intussusception from our institution demonstrated a pneumatic reduction (PR) rate of 33%, witha mortality rate of 9.1%. Numerous protocol changes were implemented, and as part of a national prospective observational study, asubsequent cohort of patients was compared with the initial series.Objectives. To compare our current series of children presenting with intussusception with our previous series. Specifically, we aimed tocompare PR rates, resection rates, morbidity and mortality.Methods. This was a retrospective review of patients aged <3 years who presented with intussusception to Chris Hani BaragwanathAcademic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, from 2011 to 2015 (era 2). Clinical outcomes of patients and management modalitieswere reviewed. These were compared with results reported in the previous article (2007 - 2010, era 1).Results. A total of 111 patients were included. PR was attempted in 52 patients (46.8%). It was successful in 25 patients (48.1%) andunsuccessful in 27 (51.9%), with an overall success rate of 22.5%. Eighty-six patients (77.5%) underwent surgical intervention. Bowelresection was performed in 54/86 of the surgically managed patients. No deaths were reported during the era 2 study period.Conclusion. Despite improved protocols, we could not demonstrate an improvement in the proportion of attempted PR cases comparedwith our previous series, and we did not achieve better PR rates. This failure is thought to be due to the delayed presentation of our patients,as well as an aggressive approach to management. However, this aggressive management strategy has decreased our mortality rate to zero.
肠套叠的临床结果:南非约翰内斯堡的经验
背景。我们机构先前对肠套叠的研究表明,气动复位(PR)率为33%,死亡率为9.1%。作为一项全国性前瞻性观察性研究的一部分,随后的患者队列与最初的系列进行了比较。比较我们目前的系列患儿肠套叠的表现和我们以前的系列。具体来说,我们的目的是比较PR率、切除率、发病率和死亡率。这是一项对2011年至2015年(时代2)在南非约翰内斯堡的Chris Hani baragwanath学术医院就诊的年龄<3岁的肠套叠患者的回顾性研究。对患者的临床结果和管理方式进行了回顾。这些结果与上一篇文章(2007 - 2010,时代1)报道的结果进行了比较。共纳入111例患者。52例患者(46.8%)尝试PR。成功25例(48.1%),不成功27例(51.9%),总成功率为22.5%。86例(77.5%)行手术干预。54/86的手术患者行肠切除术。第2期研究期间无死亡报告。尽管改进了方案,但我们无法证明与之前的系列相比,尝试PR病例的比例有所提高,并且我们没有获得更好的PR率。这种失败被认为是由于我们的病人的延迟表现,以及积极的管理方法。然而,这种积极的管理策略使我们的死亡率降至零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信